The Count de Tournon, an honest man, an excellent economist, a
Conservative as to all existing powers, and a judge rather too much
prejudiced in favour of the Popes, said, in 1832:--
"From this concentration of the powers of pontiff, bishop,
and sovereign, naturally arises the most absolute authority
possible over temporal affairs; but the exercise of this
authority, tempered by the usages and forms of government,
is even still more so by the virtues of the Pontiffs who for
many years have filled the chair of St. Peter; so that this
most absolute of governments is exercised with extreme
mildness. The Pope is an elective sovereign; his States are
the patrimony of Catholicism, because they are the pledge of
the independence of the chief of the faithful, and the
reigning Pope is the supreme administrator, the guardian of
this domain."
Finally, the Count de Rayneval, the latest and least felicitous
apologist of the Papacy, made in 1856 the following admissions:--
"_Not long ago_ the ancient traditions of the Court of Rome
were faithfully observed. All modifications of established
usages, all improvements, even material, were viewed with an
evil eye, and seemed full of danger. Public affairs were
exclusively managed by prelates. The higher posts in the
State were by law interdicted to laymen. In practice the
different powers were often confounded. The principle of
pontifical infallibility was applied to administrative
questions. The personal decision of the Sovereign had been
known to reverse the decision of the tribunals, even in
civil matters. The Cardinal Secretary of State, first
minister in the fullest extent of the term, concentred in
his own hands all the powers of the State. Under his supreme
direction the different branches of the administration were
confided to clerks rather than ministers. These neither
formed a council, nor deliberated together upon the affairs
of the State. The public finances were administered in the
most profound secrecy. No information was communicated to
the nation as to the mode in which its revenues were spent.
Not only did the budget remain a mystery, but it was
afterwards discovered that the accounts were frequently not
made up and balanced. Lastly, municipal liberties, which are
appreciated above all others by the Italians, and which more
particularly respond to their real tendencies, had been
submitted to the most restrictive measures. _But from the
day on which Pope Pius IX. ascended the throne_" etc. etc.
Thus we find that the _not long ago_ of the Count de Rayneval is an
exact date. It means, in good French, "before the election of Pius
IX.," or again, "up to the 16th of June, 1846."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account