The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal lifeGrew, Edwin Sharpe
Science
The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal life
Grew, Edwin Sharpe
Geology; Paleontology
No, that will not do. We will not confuse our readers by telling them
all the theories that have been formed, but will only state what
the late Lord Kelvin believed, and most of the present generation
of geologists believe. It is that the heat of the earth's crust
continues to increase only for a certain distance of the way down,
and that owing to pressure the earth is solid (though very hot
except towards the surface) for two thousand miles down. There
remains a thickness of another four thousand miles on either side
of the earth's centre to be considered. That might be molten, but
the pressure would be so great that it would behave as if it were a
solid. We know the earth cannot be solid all through because it does
not weigh enough. The earth cannot, of course, be weighed in any
scales, but there are methods of weighing it nevertheless. One of
two methods is by seeing how strongly it attracts bodies to itself.
But these things belong rather to the romance of astronomy than to
that of geology. We need only trouble ourselves at present about the
results.
One word more about the deep interior of the earth. Dr. J. J. See,
an American astronomer, has found how heavy and how hard the earth
is, taken as a whole. He finds that if it were built from surface
to surface of hardened steel it would be just about as heavy and
as hard--or as rigid. The steel would be like that used for the
armour-plate of battleships. Dr. See is not prepared, however, to
discard the idea that the earth has a large fluid interior. If it
were fluid, yet it would be subjected to such enormous pressure by
its own weight, that if there were a moderately thick earth-crust,
its tidal surgings would be so "cabin'd, cribbed, confined," that
they would be comparatively ineffectual. We must not run away with
the idea (against which Dr. See specially warns us), that there is
any free circulation of currents within the fluid interior. The
rigidity produced by pressure (or weight) is too great for that.
Indeed, this pressure is so great that, as another scientific
authority, Professor Arrhenius, has pointed out, the matter at
the core of the earth might even be gaseous; and yet would be so
compressed by pressure that it would possess a rigidity equal to the
hardest steel. The earth may be partly solid, partly liquid, partly
gaseous, but for all practical purposes Professor See would have us
regard it as a solid sphere having an average hardness and weight
and "rigidity" greater than that of ordinary steel.
We are still some way off an explanation of how the many igneous
rocks which were and are being "boiled up" in some inner molten
cauldron came to the surface; but the better to understand that we
must ask our readers to carry their imagination back to the very
beginning of the world when it was "without form and void."
CHAPTER VIII
THE EARTH AT ITS BEGINNING
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account