The Royal Road to Health; or, the Secret of Health Without DrugsTyrrell, Chas. A. (Charles Alfred)
Science
The Royal Road to Health; or, the Secret of Health Without Drugs
Tyrrell, Chas. A. (Charles Alfred)
Enema; Health; Health -- Popular works; Health promotion; Hygiene
Opinions may, and do, differ as to the source from which this
sustenance for the body should be obtained--whether from the animal or
vegetable kingdoms, or both, and while admitting that vegetarianism and
flesh-eating both have their advantages and disadvantages, our own
conscientious conviction is, that the true solution of the question is
to be found in the happy medium--that a mixed diet is the best for
mankind under existing conditions.
The main argument of our vegetarian friends against the practice of
flesh-eating is the humanitarian one. We are familiar with all the
objections urged--the brutalizing effect upon the human mind of so much
ruthless blood-shed--of the sacredness of life, and of man’s presumption
in daring to deprive a living creature of existence; but with all due
respect to the sensibilities of these worthy people, we are inclined to
think that the argument is scarcely tenable. We do not wish to be
understood as defending the cruelties that are said to be practised in
the abattoirs; but the taking of life is inseparable from existence. It
is simply a question of degree. There is a sect in India, the members of
which are so scrupulous regarding the sanctity of life that they
carefully brush every step of the path in front of them, lest they
should inadvertently step upon any creeping thing. In this, they lift
the burden of responsibility from themselves for any wanton injury; but
the microscope has shown us that there is a countless world of
infinitesimal life all around us, and that it is practically impossible
to draw a breath, or drink a mouthful of water, without destroying some
living thing. If we accept the teaching of the Scriptures, that not a
sparrow falls to the ground without the knowledge of the Creator, then
we must conclude that the life of the ant is of as much importance in
His eyes as that of the ox or sheep. We repeat, we are not posing as
advocates of indiscriminate and wanton slaughter, but on utilitarian
grounds, we consider the use of the flesh of animals, as a food,
justifiable.
If we needed any scriptural authority for the practice, we could point
to the Hebrews, who (according to Holy Writ) received through Moses not
only permission to use meat as an article of diet, but instructions for
the killing of the selected animals, together with injunctions to avoid
the flesh of certain kinds; and they may be cited as a striking example
of the value of a mixed diet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account