Nevertheless a school conducted by a department of a university must
have another aspect. From the university standpoint, the most important
part of its work is the scientific—the contribution it makes to the
progress of educational thinking. The aim of educating a certain number
of children would hardly justify a university in departing from the
tradition which limits it to those who have completed their secondary
instruction. Only the scientific aim, the conduct of a laboratory,
comparable to other scientific laboratories, can furnish a reason for the
maintenance by a university of an elementary school. Such a school is a
laboratory of applied psychology. That is, it has a place for the study
of mind as manifested and developed in the child, and for the search
after materials and agencies that seem most likely to fulfil and further
the conditions of normal growth.
It is not a normal school or a department for the training of teachers.
It is not a model school. It is not intended to demonstrate any one
special idea or doctrine. Its task is the problem of viewing the
education of the child in the light of the principles of mental activity
and processes of growth made known by modern psychology. The problem
by its nature is an infinite one. All that any school can do is to
make contributions here and there, and to stand for the necessity of
considering education, both theoretically and practically, in this light.
This being the end, the school conditions must, of course, agree. To
endeavor to study the process and laws of growth under such artificial
conditions as prevent many of the chief facts of child life from showing
themselves is an obvious absurdity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account