The chairman introduced the business of the hour with all solemnity. The
committee had met to consider the charge made by Newbury that Westcott’s
had won the game of Saturday by unfair and dishonorable methods. It had
been to him a great disappointment that the first contest in the new
league, to which he had devoted so much time and thought, should have
been darkened by scandal. He felt, however, and he was confident that
the majority of the committee agreed with him, that there could be no
turning back upon the ideals of the league—again those ideals!—The
mere winning or losing of a game was of slight consequence compared with
the supreme importance of holding unswervingly to the highest
conceptions of honor and gentlemanly conduct.
“The old hypocrite!” whispered Pete in Sumner’s ear.
“Hush!” and a warning hand clutched the offender’s knee.
The chairman now read the protest,—which wound up with a demand that
the game be declared forfeited to Newbury,—and complacently asked what
should be done with it, addressing presumably the whole committee, but
looking straight before him at the two members from Trowbridge.
“I think we ought to consider first the grounds for the protest, and
afterwards, if the protest is sustained, the penalty,” said Mr. Snyder.
“Very well,” agreed the chairman; “we will hear the Newbury statements
first.”
If the protest is sustained! Why should they mention the penalty at all
unless they meant to sustain the protest? Talbot became more than ever
convinced that the whole affair was prejudged and that the proceedings
would be merely the carrying out of a prearranged plan.
He listened closely to Newbold, none the less, when the latter, in the
capacity of prosecuting attorney, presented his case. Newbury had been
unfortunate this year in the selection of Callahan as coach. A week
before the game with Westcott’s, for certain reasons unnecessary to
state, he had been discharged. Callahan was very “sore” and declared in
presence of witnesses—Newbold held up a paper which he said contained
their statements—that he’d “get even.” A few days afterward, Callahan
had been observed at the Westcott field in long conversation with a
Westcott player—another display of papers. Later this player was seen
conferring with Harrison and others of the football men. In the course
of this conference, one of the Westcott men dropped a paper which the
witness secured; on it was written the address of the discharged coach.
Suspecting an attempt to steal a knowledge of their game, Newbury had
changed certain plays and signals, but because the time was too short to
master an entirely new set they had been compelled to use a large number
of the old ones. In the game Westcott’s had often understood the Newbury
signals as soon as they were given out, and it was the old signals which
they understood. Through a knowledge of the signals, Westcott’s spoiled
Newbury’s play and won.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account