The science of beauty, as developed in nature and applied in artHay, D. R. (David Ramsay)
Philosophy
The science of beauty, as developed in nature and applied in art
Hay, D. R. (David Ramsay)
Aesthetics; Nature (Aesthetics); Proportion (Art)
The lines G G and K K also determine the length of the joinings of the
ear to the head. The lines L L and M M determine the vertical width of
the mouth and lips when at perfect repose, and the line N N the superior
edge of the chin. Thus simply are the features arranged and proportioned
on the facial surface.
It must, however, be borne in mind, that in treating simply of the
æsthetic beauty of the human head and countenance, we have only to do
with the external appearance. In this research, therefore, the system
of Dr Camper, Dr Owen, and others, whose investigations were more of
a physiological than an æsthetic character, can be of little service;
because, according to that system, the facial angle is determined by
drawing a line tangential to the exterior margin of the sockets of
the front teeth of the upper jaw, and the most prominent part of the
forehead. Now, as these sockets are, when the skull is naturally clothed,
and the features in repose, entirely concealed by the upper lip, we must
take the prominent part of it, instead of the sockets under it, in order
to determine properly this distinguishing mark of humanity. And I believe
it will be found, that when the head is properly poised, the nearer the
angle which this line makes with the horizontal approaches 90°, the more
symmetrically beautiful will be the general arrangement of the parts (see
line _y z_, figure 3, Plate IX.).
THE SCIENCE OF BEAUTY, AS DEVELOPED IN THE FORM OF THE HUMAN FIGURE.
The manner in which this science is developed in the symmetrical
proportions of the entire human figure, is as remarkable for its
simplicity as it has been shewn to be in those of the head and
countenance. Having gone into very full details, and given ample
illustration in two former works[19] upon this subject, I may here
confine myself to the illustration of one description of figure, and to a
reiteration of some facts stated in these works. These facts are, _1st_,
That on a given line the human figure is developed, as to its principal
points, entirely by lines drawn either from the extremities of this line,
or from some obvious or determined localities. _2d_, That the angles
which these lines make with the given line, are all simple sub-multiples
of some given fundamental angle, or bear to it a proportion expressible
under the most simple relations, such as those which constitute the scale
of music. _3d_, That the contour is resolved into a series of ellipses
of the same simple angles. And, _4th_, That these ellipses, like the
lines, are inclined to the first given line by angles which are simple
sub-multiples of the given fundamental angle. From which four facts,
and agreeably to the hypothesis I have adopted, it results as a natural
consequence that the only effort which the mind exercises through the
eye, in order to put itself in possession of the data for forming its
judgment, is this, that it compares the angles about a point, and thereby
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account