The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
There is more than one interpretation, for there are seven keys to the
mystery of the “Fall.” Moreover there are two “Falls” in Theology: the
rebellion of the Archangels and their “Fall,” and the “Fall” of Adam and
Eve. Thus the lower as well as the higher Hierarchies are charged with a
supposed crime. The word “supposed” is the true and correct term, for in
both cases it is founded on misconception. Both are considered in
Occultism as Karmic effects, and both belong to the law of
Evolution—intellectual and spiritual on the one hand, physical and psychic
on the other. The “Fall” is a universal allegory. It sets forth at one end
of the ladder of Evolution the “rebellion,” _i.e._, the action of
differentiating intellection, or consciousness, on its various planes,
seeking union with Matter; and at the other, the lower end, the rebellion
of Matter against Spirit, or of action against spiritual inertia. And here
lies the germ of an error which has had such disastrous effects on the
intelligence of civilized societies for over 1,800 years. In the original
allegory it is Matter—hence the more material Angels—which was regarded as
the conqueror of Spirit, or the Archangels who “fell” on this plane.
They of the _flaming sword_ [or animal passions] had put to flight
the Spirits of Darkness.
Yet it is the latter who fought for the supremacy of the conscious and
divine spirituality on Earth and failed, succumbing to the power of
Matter. But in theological dogma we see the reverse. It is Michael, “who
is like unto God,” the representative of Jehovah, who is the Leader of the
Celestial Hosts—as Lucifer, in Milton’s fancy, is of the Infernal
Hosts—who has the best of Satan. It is true that the nature of Michael
depends upon that of his Creator and Master. Who the latter is, one may
find out by carefully studying the allegory of the “War in Heaven” with
the astronomical key. As shown by Bentley, the “War of the Titans against
the Gods” in Hesiod, and also the War of the Asuras, or the Târakâmaya,
against the Devas in Purânic legend, are identical in all save the names.
The aspects of the stars show—Bentley taking the year 945 B.C. as the
nearest date for such conjunction—that:
All the planets, except Saturn, were on the same side of the
heavens as the Sun and Moon.
And hence were his opponents. And yet it is Saturn, or the Jewish “Moon‐
God,” who is shown as prevailing, both by Hesiod and Moses, neither of
whom was understood. Thus it was that the real meaning became distorted.
Stanza II.—_Continued._
8. THE FLAMES CAME. THE FIRES WITH THE SPARKS; THE NIGHT‐FIRES AND THE
DAY‐FIRES (_A_). THEY DRIED OUT THE TURBID DARK WATERS. WITH THEIR HEAT
THEY QUENCHED THEM. THE LHAS(136) OF THE HIGH; THE LHAMAYIN(137) OF BELOW,
CAME (_B_). THEY SLEW THE FORMS, WHICH WERE TWO‐ AND FOUR‐FACED. THEY
FOUGHT THE GOAT‐MEN, AND THE DOG‐HEADED MEN, AND THE MEN WITH FISHES’
BODIES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account