The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
It is “Jehovah,” as will be presently shown, that suggested the necessity
of veiling and screening this substitute for the unpronounceable name, and
that led to all this “mystery, parables, dark sayings and cloaking.” Moses
had, at any rate, initiated his seventy Elders into the hidden truths, and
thus the writers of the _Old Testament_ stand to a degree justified. Those
of the _New Testament_ have failed to do even so much, or so little. They
have disfigured the grand central figure of Christ by their dogmas, and
have led people ever since into millions of errors and the darkest crimes,
in His holy name.
It is evident that with the exception of Paul and Clement of Alexandria,
who had been both initiated into the Mysteries, none of the Fathers knew
much of the truth themselves. They were mostly uneducated, ignorant
people; and if such as Augustine and Lactantius, or again the Venerable
Bede and others, were so painfully ignorant until the time of Galileo(93)
of the most vital truths taught in the Pagan temples—of the rotundity of
the earth, for example, leaving the heliocentric system out of
question—how great must have been the ignorance of the rest! Learning and
sin were synonymous with the early Christians. Hence the accusations of
dealing with the Devil lavished on the Pagan Philosophers.
But truth must out. The Occultists, referred to as “the followers of the
accursed Cain,” by such writers as De Mirville, are now in a position to
reverse the tables. That which was hitherto known only to the ancient and
modern Kabalists in Europe and Asia, is now published and shown as being
mathematically true. The author of the _Key to the Hebrew‐Egyptian Mystery
or the Source of Measures_ has now proved to general satisfaction, it is
to be hoped, that the two great God‐names, Jehovah and Elohim, stood, in
one meaning of their numerical values, for a diameter and a circumference
value, respectively; in other words, that they are numerical indices of
geometrical relations; and finally that _Jehovah is Cain_ and _vice
versâ_.
This view, says the author,
Helps also to take the horrid blemish off from the name of Cain,
as a put‐up job to destroy his character; for even without these
showings, by the very text, _he_ [Cain] _was Jehovah_. So the
theological schools had better be alive to making the amend
honorable, if such a thing is possible, to the good name and fame
of the God they worship.(94)
This is not the first warning received by the “theological schools,”
which, however, no doubt knew it from the beginning, as did Clemens of
Alexandria and others. But if it be so they will profit still less by it,
as the admission would involve more for them than the mere sacredness and
dignity of the established faith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account