The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and PhilosophyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 3 of 4: The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Occultism, or Theurgy, teaches the means of producing such union. But it
is the actions of man—his personal merit alone—that can produce it on
earth, or determine its duration. This lasts from a few seconds—a flash—to
several hours, during which time the Theurgist or Theophanist is that
overshadowing “God” himself; hence he becomes endowed for the time being
with relative omniscience and omnipotence. With such perfect (divine)
Adepts as Buddha(102) and others such a hypostatical state of avatâric
condition may last during the whole life; whereas in the case of full
Initiates, who have not yet reached the perfect state of Jîvanmukta,(103)
Theopneusty, when in full sway, results for the high Adept in a full
recollection of everything seen, heard, or sensed.
Taijasa has fruition of the supersensible.(104)
For one less perfect it will end only in a partial, indistinct
remembrance; while the beginner has to face in the first period of his
psychic experiences a mere confusion, followed by a rapid and finally
complete oblivion of the mysteries seen during this super‐hypnotic
condition. The degree of recollection, when one returns to his waking
state and physical senses, depends on his spiritual and psychic
purification, the greatest enemy of spiritual memory being man’s physical
brain, the organ of his sensuous nature.
The above states are described for a clearer comprehension of terms used
in this work. There are so many and such various conditions and states
that even a Seer is liable to confound one with the other. To repeat: the
Greek, rarely‐used word, “Theophania,” meant more with the Neoplatonists
than it does with the modern maker of dictionaries. The compound word,
“Theophania” (from “theos,” “God,” and “phainomai,” “to appear”), does not
simply mean “a manifestation of God to man by _actual_ appearance”—an
absurdity, by the way—but the actual presence of a God in man, a _divine_
incarnation. When Simon the Magician claimed to be “God the Father,” what
he wanted to convey was just that which has been explained, namely, that
he was a _divine_ incarnation of his own Father, whether we see in the
latter an Angel, a God, or a Spirit; therefore he was called “that power
of God which is called great,”(105) or that power which causes the Divine
Self to enshrine itself in its lower self—man.
This is one of the several mysteries of being and incarnation. Another is
that when an Adept reaches during his lifetime that state of holiness and
purity that makes him “equal to the Angels,” then at death his
apparitional or astral body becomes as solid and tangible as was the late
body, and is transformed into the real man.(106) The old physical body,
falling off like the cast‐off serpent’s skin, the body of the “new” man
remains either visible or, at the option of the Adept, disappears from
view, surrounded as it is by the Âkâshic shell that screens it. In the
latter case there are three ways open to the Adept:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account