The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the StatesFleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
History
The Sequel of Appomattox: A Chronicle of the Reunion of the States
Fleming, Walter L. (Walter Lynwood)
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); United States -- History -- 1865-1898
Much of the work of the Freedmen's Bureau was of only temporary benefit
to both races. The results of its more permanent work were not generally
good. The institution was based upon the assumption that the negro race
must be protected from the white race. In its organization and
administration it was an impossible combination of the practical and the
theoretical, of opportunism and humanitarianism, of common sense and
idealism. It failed to exert a permanently wholesome influence because
its lesser agents were not held to strict accountability by their
superiors. Under these agents the alienation of the two races began, and
the ill feelings then aroused were destined to persist into a long and
troubled future.
CHAPTER V.
The Victory of the Radicals
The soldiers who fought through the war to victory or to defeat had been
at home nearly two years before the radicals developed sufficient
strength to carry through their plans for a revolutionary reconstruction
of the Southern States. At the end of the war a majority of the Northern
people would have supported a settlement in accordance with Lincoln's
policy. Eight months later a majority, but a smaller one, would have
supported Johnson's work had it been possible to secure a popular
decision on it. How then did the radicals gain the victory over the
conservatives? The answer to this question is given by James Ford Rhodes
in terms of personalities: "Three men are responsible for the
Congressional policy of Reconstruction: Andrew Johnson, by his obstinacy
and bad behavior; Thaddeus Stevens, by his vindictiveness and
parliamentary tyranny; Charles Sumner, by his pertinacity in a misguided
humanitarianism." The President stood alone in his responsibility, but
his chief opponents were the ablest leaders of a resolute band of
radicals.
Radicalism did not begin in the Administration of Andrew Johnson.
Lincoln had felt its covert opposition throughout the war, but he
possessed the faculty of weakening his opponents, while Johnson's
conduct usually multiplied the number and the strength of his enemies.
At first the radicals criticized Lincoln's policy in regard to slavery,
and after the Emancipation Proclamation they shifted their attack to his
"ten per cent" plan for organizing the state governments as outlined in
the Proclamation of December, 1863. Lincoln's course was distasteful to
them because he did not admit the right of Congress to dictate terms,
because of his liberal attitude towards former Confederates, and because
he was conservative on the negro question. A schism among the Republican
supporters of the war was with difficulty averted in 1864, when Frémont
threatened to lead the radicals in opposition to the "Union" party of
the President and his conservative policy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account