The Social Direction of Evolution: An Outline of the Science of EugenicsKellicott, William E. (William Erskine)
Science
The Social Direction of Evolution: An Outline of the Science of Eugenics
Kellicott, William E. (William Erskine)
Eugenics
Now, whatever the actual extent of this regression is in a group we
need to know how uniformly it occurs for all the classes of different
deviations from the general average, that is, we need to know whether
the extreme groups regress to the same relative extent as do those
nearer the general average; and, further, we need to know how nearly
the sons of fathers of any certain height are grouped about their own
average. In other words, we should know, first, whether the regression
of the sons of 62 and 76 or 67 and 71 inch fathers is proportionately
the same in each case, and, second, to what extent the sons of 62-inch
fathers vary, whether they vary as do the fathers of 62-inch sons, and
so for each group. This kind of information we get by calculating what
is called the _coefficient of heredity_. The calculation of this
coefficient is a complicated process which it is unnecessary to
describe here. It must suffice to say that a numerical coefficient can
readily be determined, which will express the average closeness and
regularity of the relationship between all the plus and minus
deviations from the group average in fathers and the corresponding
plus and minus deviations from the group average of their sons with
respect to a given characteristic. This coefficient of heredity may
vary between 0.0 and 1.0. When it is 0.0 there is, on the whole, no
regularity in the relationship, i. e., no heredity; when it is 1.0
there is, on the whole, complete regularity, i. e., heredity is
complete. Neither of these values is ever actually found in
determining coefficients of heredity in the parental relation; these
are usually between 0.3 and 0.5. It should be emphasized again that
this comparison is between whole groups and not between individuals,
and that it fails to allow for the distinction between fluctuations
and true variations. And, further, it should be noted that the
information derived from such a coefficient is defective in that it
takes into account only the relationship between the son and one
parent; the maternal relation is just as important but this has to be
determined separately. There is no satisfactory method of determining
the relation between children and both parents at the same time.
The coefficient of heredity is, therefore, an abstract numerical value
which gives us a fairly precise estimate as to the probable closeness
of the relation between deviations from the group average of any
character in two groups of relatives. The coefficient of _correlation_
is, in general, a measure of the relation between two different
characteristics or conditions in a single group of individuals. The
method of its determination and its limiting values are the same as
for the coefficient of heredity.
By experience the coefficients of heredity and correlation in general
are found to have the following significance:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account