The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
Other cases of an analogous kind have been communicated to me; and
very recently M. Soret of Geneva, in looking through a trellis-work in
metal stretched upon a frame, saw the phenomenon represented in Fig.
25, and has given the same explanation of it which I had published long
before.[37]
[36] See _Edin. Transactions_, 1846, vol. xv. p. 663, and _Phil. Mag._,
May 1847, vol. xxx. p. 305.
[37] _Bibl. Universelle_, October 1855, p. 136.
Before quitting the subject of the binocular union of _similar_
pictures, I must give some account of a series of curious phenomena
which I observed by uniting the images of lines meeting at an angular
point when the eye is placed at different heights above the plane of
the paper, and at different distances from the angular point.
[Illustration: FIG. 26.]
Let AC, BC, Fig. 26, be two lines meeting at C, the plane passing
through them being the plane of the paper, and let them be viewed by
the eyes successively placed at E‴, E″, E′, and E, at different heights
in a plane, GMN, perpendicular to the plane of the paper. Let R be the
right eye, and L the left eye, and when at E‴, let them be strained
so as to unite the points A, B. The united image of these points will
be seen at the binocular centre D‴, and the united lines AC, BC, will
have the position D‴C. In like manner, when the eye descends to E″, E′,
E, the united image D‴C will rise and diminish, taking the positions
D″C, D′C, DC, till it disappears on the line CM, when the eyes reach
M. If the eye deviates from the vertical plane GMN, the united image
will also deviate from it, and is always in a plane passing through the
common axis of the two eyes and the line GM.
If at any altitude EM, the eye advances towards ACB in the line EG, the
binocular centre D will also advance towards ACB in the line EG, and
the image DC will rise, and become shorter as its extremity D moves
along DG, and, after passing the perpendicular to GE, it will increase
in length. If the eye, on the other hand, recedes from ACB in the line
GE, the binocular centre D will also recede, and the image DC will
descend to the plane CM, and increase in length.
[Illustration: FIG. 27.]
The preceding diagram is, for the purpose of illustration, drawn in a
sort of perspective, and therefore does not give the true positions and
lengths of the united images. This defect, however, is remedied in Fig.
27, where E, E′, E″, E‴ is the middle point between the two eyes, the
plane GMN being, as before, perpendicular to the plane passing through
ACB. Now, as the distance of the eye from G is supposed to be the same,
and as AB is invariable as well as the distance between the eyes, the
distance of the binocular centres OO, D, D′, D″, D‴, P from G, will
also be invariable, and lie in a circle ODP, whose centre is G, and
whose radius is GO, the point O being determined by the formula
GM × AB
GO = GD = —————————
AB + RL.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account