It appears from this letter that Mr. Brady wished his agent to resume work immediately on his return with Mr. Carpenter and Kelly from "New England," and did not expect him to help in the search for other guilty parties in the assault case, or even to appear as a witness in court. How does this compare with the statement which had been made by Mr. Tait that the Company had taken steps towards discovering the man who committed the assault? After reading these letters from the Assistant Superintendent, it is very difficult for some of the temperance people to believe that Mr. Smith was dismissed for any reason other than that so plainly indicated in Mr. Brady's own words. Mr. Smith's next letter to Mr. Brady was as follows: "F. P. Brady, Esq. "DEAR SIR,--Your letter of the 7th inst. to hand in reply to mine of that date, which does not cover the information asked for. Now, I would like to know upon what grounds you demand my resignation, viz.: because I addressed an audience in the United States or because complaints have been made against me as you say in your letters of June 11th and July 9th, as I wish to be in a position to answer to any charges made against me. I am very sorry you take the stand against me you do in regard to my temperance principles. I understand perfectly well that I am no longer pleasant to your taste; but I expect fair treatment from the Company, and ask for nothing more. As far as my leave of absence is concerned, I have a telegram from you that I can be absent and Mr. Sinclair will take my place until I resume work again. No time is specified. Since I returned home, I have been busy looking up evidence against the parties who were instrumental in my assault on July 8th last. I intend to resume work again as soon as possible, I think about a week from Monday next, September 24th, unless advised by you that my services are no longer required. "Yours truly, W. W. SMITH, Agent. "_Sutton Junction, Sept. 11th, 1894._" As no reply came Mr. Smith wrote again: "F. P. Brady, Esq., Asst. Supt., Farnham. "DEAR SIR,--Will you please reply to my letter of the 11th inst. in regard to resuming work Monday next, September 24th. I am waiting anxiously to hear from you. "Yours truly, W. W. SMITH. "_Sutton Junction, Sept. 19th, 1894._" Still there was no answer, and on Monday morning Mr. Smith telegraphed as follows: "F. P. Brady, Esq., Farnham. "I am ready to resume work this morning. Please reply. W. W. SMITH. "_Sutton Junction, Sept. 24th, 1894._" To this came the following reply: "W. W. Smith, Sutton Junction. "Nothing for you to do this morning. Will advise you when your services are required. "F. P. BRADY. "_Farnham, Sept. 24th, 1894._"