Milan (Italy) -- Description and travel; Milan (Italy) -- History
With the power of the people was associated as of old the predominance
of papal influence in the city and the depression of the archiepiscopal
See. St. Peter had now completely subjected St. Ambrose. The assumption
of supremacy in temporal as well as spiritual matters on the part of the
Popes, their constant interference by means of legates, the activity of
their innumerable and ubiquitous agents, the friars, had indeed reduced
the seat of Ariberto to comparative insignificance, while the decay of
feudal power and the depression of the aristocracy had robbed it of its
wealth. But even assisted by the Pope, and at the height of their
strength and triumph, the popular forces were impotent to establish any
enduring order in the city. The nobles were still too powerful to submit
peaceably to political inferiority. Moreover, as the offices and honours
once confined to them became open to all, the successful and wealthy
plebeians tended to join the upper class, which began to lose
distinction of race in that of wealth and ability. The aristocracy, thus
continually replenished with new blood, received fresh vigour and life,
and the old divisions gradually merged into two classes, the _milites_,
who fought on horseback and in armour, and the _plebs_, or general mass
of citizens, who, little trained and lightly armed, accompanied the
horsemen into battle on foot. The struggle between these two radical
orders transformed Milan’s short period of republican liberty into a
scene of anarchy and civil warfare, leading to the inevitable end of
faction and strife, the tyranny of an individual.
Already by the end of the twelfth century the struggle of the factions
over the annual election of the Consuls occasioned so much tumult and
bloodshed, that the citizens in despair agreed with one accord to submit
themselves to the government of a Podestà chosen from outside. But this
device for peace ended by aggravating the strife. The faction uppermost
for the time appointed a fierce partisan from another city, perhaps the
leader of an exiled faction, who embroiled Milan with his own Commune,
and exalted his sympathisers within her walls at the expense of the
other party. The general discontent and disorder was reflected in
constant changes in the Constitution. In the absence of any stable
principle of government the power tended to fall into the hands of
individuals. This was the opportunity of the nobles, from whose order
the leaders of men naturally sprang. Taking advantage of the forces
ready to their hands, these put themselves at the head of aristocrats or
plebs, without much regard for principle, and in so doing resumed their
ancient pre-eminence in the community, and initiated the new Epoch of
Great Men, which was to succeed the failing Epoch of the People.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account