Milan (Italy) -- Description and travel; Milan (Italy) -- History
The growing power of the Della Torre began before long to rouse
suspicion and distrust in Rome, in spite of their steady championship of
the popular cause. The hold of the Papacy upon Milan was in fact
somewhat uncertain. The people still remembered with pride the ancient
tradition of their Church, and were inclined at times to resent the
constant interference of the Pope and his inquisitorial friars. In this
feeling lay the possibility of a union between the Archbishop and the
democratic party, which it was the policy of Rome to avert, even at the
cost of prolonging and aggravating the miserable state of civil war in
Milan. On the death of Frate Leone in 1257, the Della Torre sought to
raise Raimondo, a son of Pagano the Good, to the archiepiscopal throne.
Their intention was defeated by the opposition of the nobles, secretly
instigated by Urban IV., and after some years of controversy over the
vacant seat, Urban, thinking to hold the balance of parties in his own
hands, appointed to it Otto Visconte (1263). The paradoxical spectacle
of the Pope raising a Ghibelline noble to power, and the noble accepting
it from the Pope—one of those strange eddies constantly occurring in the
political current of the day—was completed by the alliance of the Della
Torre with the celebrated Captain, Oberto da Pellavicino, protector of
heretics, close comrade once of Ezzelino and the Ghibellines, and mortal
foe of the Church. Into the hands of this typical figure of the North
Italian drama, Martino, pressed by the hostility of the nobles and the
secret machinations of the Pope, had in 1259 surrendered the Lordship of
Milan for five years. Under his leadership the Torriani oppressed the
friars, drove out the papal legate, Cardinal Ottaviano da Ubaldino, and
on the elevation of Otto Visconte to the See, seized upon all the
episcopal territories and revenues, and kept the new prelate for years
out of his ecclesiastical capital. Pope Urban retaliated with spiritual
thunders, and Milan lay long under the heavy spell of the papal
interdict.
The Visconti and the Torriani were already deadly foes. The House of the
Snake, which in Archbishop Otto, was now about to begin its great
ascent, to the overthrow and destruction of the Tower of its rivals,
probably derived its origin and name from one of the Viscounts of the
Carlovingian rule, who had succeeded in converting the territory
entrusted to his administration into an hereditary appanage. It was, in
any case, of great antiquity in the city. The famous cognizance which
its later career invested with a peculiar terror, is said to have been
won by a noble crusader of the House, also an Otto, in single combat
with a Saracen, who carried a shield emblazoned with the device of a
seven-coiled serpent devouring a child. Otto slew the Saracen and
adopted the device, which he transmitted to his descendants, and with it
who knows what mysterious and persistent curse of guile and cruelty?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account