Finally the siege of Namur stands out prominently as the marked success
in the campaign, and gives to one regiment, the 18th, the motto of
“_Virtutis Namurcensis Præmium_.” It lost 297 of all ranks in the final
attack. The regiments present in this famous siege were 1st, 5th,
6th, 7th Dragoon Guards, the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Dragoons, the 4th and
7th Light Dragoons, the 5th, 15th, 18th, and 19th Foot, forming one
division to keep in check the relieving force of Marshal Villeroy. The
other was composed of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 16th, and 17th Foot,
to carry out the actual siege operations. The greatest gallantry was
shown throughout by both sides; but the place finally fell, and it is
curious to note the punctiliousness of the soldiers of those days in
that Marshal Boufflers, though all the fortress had been captured save
only the castle, and though Villeroy was powerless to raise the siege,
would not capitulate without an assault. Unnecessary as it was, it was
undertaken, at the cost of 2000 men, and for the first time a great
fortress was surrendered by a French marshal to a British general.
Here it was that Sterne’s “Captain Shandy” was wounded in the groin
before the gate of St. Nicholas. Lord, formerly Colonel, Cutts, of the
regiment that bore his name, and to which another novelistic hero (this
time one of Thackeray’s), in the person of “Count Maximilian Gustavus
Adolphus von Galgenstein,” is presumed to have belonged, behaved with
his usual gallantry; and, says contemporaneous authority, “the bravery
of our infantry was very remarkable, for they forced the enemy from
several posts where they were very well lodged.”
Of this Cutts, the colonel of a regiment of old time, it is said that
“few considerable actions happened in the wars in which he was not,
and hath been wounded in all the actions in which he served”; and
again: “In that bull-dog courage which flinches from no danger, however
terrible, he was unrivalled.” There was no difficulty in finding hardy
volunteers, German, Dutch, and British, to go on a forlorn hope; but
Cutts was the only man who appeared to consider such an expedition as
a party of pleasure. He was so much at his ease in the hottest fire of
the French batteries that his soldiers gave him the honourable name of
“The Salamander.” He was a fighting man of the time; became baronet
first, and was then raised to the peerage, and of him it was written--
“The warlike Cutts the welcome tidings brings,
The true, brave servant of the best of kings--
Cutts, whose known worth no herald need proclaim,
His wounds and his own worth can speak his fame.”
Still, with all that, he had not enough science to make a general.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account