The story of the sun, moon, and starsGiberne, Agnes
Science
The story of the sun, moon, and stars
Giberne, Agnes
Astronomy -- Juvenile literature
We who are placed midway between the Pole and the Equator, see a
mixture of these two motions. Some stars seem to circle round and
round, as all would do if we stood at the North Pole. Some stars seem
to rise and set, as all would do if we stood at the Equator. So much
for the seeming movements of the stars.
But now, about their real movements. Are the stars fixed, or are they
not? These seeming daily and yearly motions do not affect the question,
being merely caused by our own motions. Trees and hedges may appear to
move as we rush past them in a train, yet they are really fixed.
[Illustration: CONSTELLATION OF ORION 50,000 YEARS FROM NOW.]
During a long while, after it was found out that the quick, daily
movements of all the stars in company were merely apparent, men
believed that they really had no “proper motions”--that is, no
movements of their own. For century after century the constellations
remain the same. Hundreds of years ago the seven chief stars of the
Great Bear shone in company as they shine now. Who could suppose that
each one of those seven stars is hurrying on its path through space
with a speed exceeding far that of the swiftest express-train? Yet so
it is. Hundreds of years ago the grand group of Orion, with belt and
sword, gleamed brilliantly night by night as it gleams in these days;
and Cassiopeia had her W form, and Hercules and Draco and Andromeda
were shaped as they are shaped still. Who would imagine that through
those hundreds of years each star of these different constellations was
hastening with more or less of speed along its heavenly road? Yet so it
is.
Cases have been decisively ascertained of stars changing their places
among the other stars by a slow and gradual motion. Three of the most
conspicuous of them--Sirius, Arcturus, and Aldebaran--have been proved,
by the comparison of modern with some ancient observations, to have
experienced a change of place to the southward, to the extent of more
than the breadth of the moon in all the three. And during the period of
accurate modern measurement, other instances have been ascertained of
steady change of place by the effect of proper motion.
But if the stars are thus rapidly moving in all directions, how is it
that we do not _see_ them move? How is it that, night after night, year
after year, century after century, even thousand years after thousand
years, the shapes of the constellations remain unaltered?
Suppose you and I were standing on the seashore together, watching
the movements of scores of sea-craft, little boats and large boats,
steamers, yachts, and ships. Suppose we stood through a full quarter
of an hour looking on. Some might move, it is true, very slowly; yet
their movements in every case would plainly be seen. There could be no
possibility of mistaking the fact, or of supposing them to be “fixed.”
Just so we see the nearer planets move. Little danger of our supposing
them to be “fixed stars.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account