The Story of the Woman's PartyGillmore, Inez Haynes
History
The Story of the Woman's Party
Gillmore, Inez Haynes
National Woman's Party; Paul, Alice, 1885-1977; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
On August 29 and 30, this newly-formed Advisory Council met at Newport.
Mrs. O. H. P. Belmont did everything to make the occasion a success. She
threw open Marble House which, hung with the great purple, white, and
gold banners of the Congressional Union and flooded with golden light,
made an extraordinary background for the deliberations of the
Conference. In every way possible for her she used the beauty and social
prestige of Newport to give the occasion dignity, prominence, and
publicity. Her daughter, the Duchess of Marlborough, had joined the
Congressional Union just previous to this Conference. Little she thought
and little the Congressional Union thought that as an English woman, she
would be a voter, would be elected to the London City Council before her
mother, an American woman, was enfranchised.
Here, for the first time, the plan of holding the Democratic Party—the
Party in power—responsible for the slowness with which the Suffrage work
was progressing, and, in consequence, of working against it, was adopted
as a program actually to be carried out.
Lucy Burns made a magnificent speech on that occasion. She pointed out
that the Democratic Party was in complete possession of the National
Government, controlling the Presidential chair, the Senate, possessing
an overwhelming majority in the House. She analyzed the working of
Congress: she showed that our government is a government by Party: that
no measures of importance had passed through the Sixty-third Congress
without the backing of the Party in power: and that no measure could
pass that Congress if opposed by that Party.
She amplified this thesis. She showed that the President, the leader of
the Party, had seven times refused his powerful aid to the movement. She
showed that in the Senate the Democratic leaders blocked the Suffrage
measure by bringing it to a vote at a time when they acknowledged it
would be defeated. She showed that in the House, the Rules Committee had
consistently blocked the Amendment, both by preventing the creation of a
Suffrage Committee and by preventing consideration of the Amendment in
the House. And she proved by the words of the acting chairman of the
Rules Committee that that Committee had in its keeping “the policy of
the Democratic Party.” She showed that the Democratic Caucus had taken
definite action against the Suffrage Amendment. It had declared that
Suffrage was not a question for national consideration and so it had
refused to sanction the creation of a Suffrage Committee.
Alice Paul, first asking the press to withdraw, outlined the proposed
election program. She asked the members of the Conference not to reveal
it until the middle of September when the Congressional Union would be
ready to put it into practical operation. This is her speech on that
occasion:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account