The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
History
The strange career of the Chevalier d'Eon de Beaumont : $b Minister plenipotentiary from France to Great Britain in 1763
Telfer, J. Buchan (John Buchan)
Eon de Beaumont, Charles Geneviève Louis Auguste André Timothée d', 1728-1810; France -- Foreign relations -- 1715-1774
The opportunity for leaving D’Eon in charge on the departure of the
ambassador seeming to be lost, de Nivernois recommended him for
appointment as Resident, an arrangement desirable in the interests of the
King’s service, and one which would enable de Guerchy to receive such
valuable assistance as no other person but the secretary of Embassy was
qualified to render, for he was fully competent to continue the work he,
the ambassador, had commenced. D’Eon’s presence was preferable to that of
a stranger. Lord Bute had taken a fancy to him, which was saying a great
deal, and was a piece of luck that might not fall to a new-comer. On the
other hand, D’Eon was being informed by M. Sainte Foy, senior clerk at
the Foreign Office, that it was earnestly desired he should remain with
de Guerchy, and yet de Praslin was slow in paying the smallest attention
to de Nivernois’ frequent recommendations in his favour. De Praslin had
his reasons; he doubted D’Eon’s loyalty towards himself, and suspected
him of being in correspondence with the exiled de Broglios. He should
put him to the test, and how this was accomplished shall be related in
D’Eon’s own words:—
‘One evening about midnight, towards the end of March, the
Duke de Praslin put me through a kind of interrogatory. Sainte
Foy was a witness. The duke said: “You were at the battle of
Villinghausen, M. D’Eon; tell me all you saw and all you know
with regard to that action.” I did so conscientiously, relating
to him all I saw with my own eyes. My recital not being either
to his taste or to that of the Count de Guerchy, his satellite,
who was present, he interrupted me frequently by stamping his
foot; and rising from his chair he said to me several times:
“I know it to have been the contrary to what you say, and
this from one of my intimate friends who was also there.” He
alluded to the Count de Guerchy. He then looked at Sainte
Foy. At every reply I made, the duke looked cross and gave a
sardonic smile. “But, my dear D’Eon, you surely did not witness
all you relate?” I persisted in assuring him, as I should do
to my life’s end, that I had perfectly well seen and heard
what I had told him. The duke concluded by saying: “It is your
attachment to the de Broglios that makes you speak as you do.”
“Faith, sir!” I replied; “it is my attachment to the truth. You
question me, and I can only tell you what I myself know.” After
we had left the minister, Sainte Foy scolded me in a friendly
way for my want of policy. “My dear D’Eon,” he said, “I fear
you will never make your fortune in this country. Be off to
England as quickly as you can.” “I wish for nothing better,”
was my reply.’[93]
Eighteen years after the battle of Villinghausen, D’Eon wrote:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account