The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
History
The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910
Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
Women -- Suffrage -- Great Britain
Meanwhile Mr. Keir Hardie had secured a place for a Women's Suffrage
Resolution which was to be discussed in the House of Commons on the
evening of April 25th. Though a resolution is only an expression
of opinion and can have no practical legislative effect, this was
considered important because it was realised that if the new Parliament
were to show a substantial majority in its support, the women's claim
that the Government should deal with the question would be greatly
strengthened. Unfortunately only a second place had been obtained
for the Resolution. Hence there was every reason to fear that, as so
often before, our talkative opponents would succeed in preventing its
being voted upon. The situation became more hopeful, however, when
the Anti-Vivisectionists, who had obtained the first place for the
evening, entered into a compromise by which they agreed to withdraw
their resolution early. The way was thus left clear for the Votes for
Women Resolution, but we ourselves still thought that the "talkers out"
would probably have their way. We were determined not to allow this to
happen without protest. Therefore, in order to be in readiness for any
emergency, a large number of us had obtained tickets for the Ladies'
Gallery.
Looking down through the brass grille, from behind which women are
alone permitted to listen to the debates in Parliament, we saw that
the House was crowded as is usual only at important crises, and that
both the Government and Opposition front benches were fully occupied.
The Resolution, "That in the opinion of this House it is desirable
that sex should cease to be a bar to the exercise of the Parliamentary
franchise" was moved and seconded in short speeches in order that
the opponents should have no least excuse for urging that there had
been no time for their own side to be fairly heard. Then Mr. Cremer
rose to speak in opposition. His speech was grossly insulting to
women and altogether unworthy of a Member of the People's House of
Representatives. Both by his words, his voice and gestures he plainly
showed his entire view of women to be degraded and indeed revolting.
Yet, though one was angry with him, he was an object for pity as he
stood there, undersized and poorly made, obviously in bad health and
with that narrow, grovelling and unimaginative point of view, flaunting
his masculine superiority. The women found it very difficult to sit
quietly listening to him, and, though my mother strove to check them,
some subdued exclamations caught the Speaker's ear. He immediately
gave orders for the police to be in readiness to clear the Ladies'
Gallery if any further sounds should issue from it. But, once Mr.
Cremer had finished speaking, absolute quiet was restored. Mr. Willie
Redmond, brother of John Redmond, the leader of the Irish Party, then
indignantly protested against the tone of Mr. Cremer's speech, crying
fervently that he himself had always believed in Women's Suffrage
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account