The telephone, the microphone & the phonographDu Moncel, Th., comte
History
The telephone, the microphone & the phonograph
Du Moncel, Th., comte
Microphone; Phonograph; Telephone
_Telephones with several diaphragms._--When we remember that the
induced currents caused in a magnet result from the vibratory movements
of the diaphragm, and that these are produced by the vibrations of
the stratum of air interposed between this diaphragm and the vocal
organ, it necessarily follows that if these vibrations of the air react
on several diaphragms, each attached to its electro-magnetic organ,
several induced currents might be caused simultaneously, and if these
were properly connected, their effects on the receiver would be so
much the more intense, since the sounds produced would result from the
combination of several sources of sound. Several inventors, starting
from this argument, have planned instruments of varying ingenuity,
which we will now describe, but without being able to declare who
was the first to realise this idea. It is in fact so simple, that it
probably suggested itself to the minds of several inventors at the
same time, and we see that while M. Trouvé proposed this improvement
in France in November 1877, it was tried in America and discussed in
England, where indeed it was not expected to produce very favourable
results. Mr. Preece wrote on the subject in a paper entitled ‘On some
Physical Points connected with the Telephone,’ which was published
in April 1878. He observes that all the attempts to improve the
telephone have ended in disappointment and failure. One of the first
attempts of the kind was made by Mr. Wilmot, who expected to obtain
favourable results by augmenting the number of diaphragms, helices,
and magnets, connecting the helices in a series, and causing them
to act simultaneously, so as to increase the energy of the currents
developed by the influence of the voice; but experience showed that
when the instrument acted directly, the vibratory effect of each of the
diaphragms decreased in proportion to their number, and the general
effect remained the same as with a single diaphragm. Mr. Wilmot’s
instrument was made in the beginning of October 1877, and that of M.
Trouvé was only an imitation of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account