The Theory of the Theatre, and Other Principles of Dramatic CriticismHamilton, Clayton Meeker
History
The Theory of the Theatre, and Other Principles of Dramatic Criticism
Hamilton, Clayton Meeker
Drama -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Theater
In the _Autobiography of Joseph Jefferson_, that humorous and human and
instructive book, there is a passage that illustrates admirably the bearing
of this same principle of economy of attention upon the actor's art. In
speaking of the joint performances of his half-brother, Charles Burke, and
the famous actor-manager, William E. Burton, Jefferson says:
It was a rare treat to see Burton and Burke in the same play:
they acted into each other's hands with the most perfect skill;
there was no striving to outdo each other. If the scene required
that for a time one should be prominent, the other would become
the background of the picture, and so strengthen the general
effect; by this method they produced a perfectly harmonious
work. For instance, Burke would remain in repose, attentively
listening while Burton was delivering some humorous speech. This
would naturally act as a spell upon the audience, who became by
this treatment absorbed in what Burton was saying, and having
got the full force of the effect, they would burst forth in
laughter or applause; then, by one accord, they became silent,
intently listening to Burke's reply, which Burton was now
strengthening by the same repose and attention. I have never
seen this element in acting carried so far, or accomplished with
such admirable results, not even upon the French stage, and I am
convinced that the importance of it in reaching the best
dramatic effects cannot be too highly estimated. It was this
characteristic feature of the acting of these two great artists
that always set the audience wondering which was the better. The
truth is there was no "better" about the matter. They were not
horses running a race, but artists painting a picture; it was
not in their minds which should win, but how they could, by
their joint efforts, produce a perfect work.
I am afraid that this excellent method of team play is more honored in the
breach than in the observance among many of our eminent actors of the
present time. When Richard Mansfield played the part of Brutus, he
destroyed the nice balance of the quarrel scene with Cassius by attracting
all of the attention of the audience to himself, whereas a right reading of
the scene would demand a constant shifting of attention from one hero to
the other. When Joseph Haworth spoke the great speech of Cassius beginning,
"Come, Antony, and young Octavius, come!", he was shrouded in the shadow of
the tent, while the lime-light fell full upon the form of Brutus. This
arrangement so distracted the audience from the true dramatic value of the
scene that neither Mansfield's heroic carriage, nor his eye like Mars to
threaten and command, nor the titanic resonance of his ventriloquial
utterance, could atone for the mischief that was done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account