Detective and mystery stories; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
This explanation, which was accepted implicitly by Claude, was by no
means the truth. With his usual sharpness Tait had noted Mrs. Bezel was
profoundly jealous of the lawyer's wife, and from this, and sundry other
hints, had drawn conclusions by no means flattering to the lady herself.
Still, as she was Claude's mother, he had too much good breeding, and
too much liking for his friend, to state his belief--which was that the
bond between Mr. Hilliston and Mrs. Bezel was not of so harmless a
nature as they would have the world believe.
With this idea in his head, Tait began to look at the case from the
point of view adopted by John Parver. Might it not be true that
Hilliston was the secret lover of the wife and the murderer of the
husband? Certainly the efforts he was making to stay Claude in solving
the mystery gave color to the idea. If he were innocent of crime and
illicit passion he would surely be anxious to hasten, instead of
retarding, the discovery. Tait's private opinion was that Hilliston had
the crime of murder on his soul, but for obvious reasons, not
unconnected with Mrs. Bezel, he did not care to speak openly to Larcher.
On the contrary, while admitting a disbelief in the lawyer, he feigned a
doubt of his complicity in the matter which he was far from feeling.
Under these circumstances he had advised Claude to leave the matter
alone, for he dreaded the effect on his friend's mind when he learned
the truth.
Whether Hilliston proved innocent or not, the unraveling of the mystery
would necessarily result in the disclosure of the relations existing
between him and Mrs. Bezel. Tait shrank from pursuing investigations
likely to lead to such a result, but the determination of Claude to
avenge his father's murder left him no option. Against his better
judgment he was urged along the path of discovery; but trusted when the
time came to soften the blow of the inevitable result.
In silence he heard the story related by Claude of the evening at
Hilliston's, and did not comment on the information thus given so
speedily as Larcher expected. He thought it wiser to delay any remarks
till he had told the young man of his interview with Mrs. Bezel.
"I need not go into details, Claude," he said, anxious not to say too
much, "but will tell you as shortly as I can. Mrs. Bezel--it is more
convenient to speak of her so than to call her your mother--is not
pleased that you should try and solve this mystery."
"I know that. She thinks it is hopeless, and is unwilling that I should
waste my time to no purpose. But she should have thought of that before
inducing Hilliston to show me the paper. Now it is too late, and for my
own satisfaction, if not for hers, I must go on with the matter. Did you
relate our conversation with Linton?"
"Yes. And she takes the same view of it as Hilliston. That Miss Paynton
got the case from a bundle of old newspapers."
"What do you think yourself?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account