The existence of remains of land animals throughout the larger part of the Qasr el Sagha series and in still greater quantity in the basal beds of the overlying Fluvio-marine series, and occasionally in the highest beds also, points to the presence of continental land within no great distance of the area in which these deposits were laid down. That the animal-remains were carried out from the land by river currents is almost certain, and although in some cases such currents are known to persist to great distances from their points of emergence, it seems probable from the quantity and mode of distribution that the Fayûm bones were deposited within a moderate distance of land. Moreover, the silicified trees, by which the bones are so often accompanied, occur together in very great quantities, and we should imagine that the individual trees would have been far more scattered if they had been floated to considerable distances from land. On the other hand the fact that among the hundreds of trees examined, in no single case were branches found attached to the trunk, points to the conclusion that these trees had travelled great distances; probably the branches were lost during their river journey, from constant jamming together of a great number in a more or less constricted space, and not after they had left the river mouth. The exact position of this land-mass is a highly interesting and important question. There is no reason to suppose that land of any extent occurred to the north, except possibly an occasional island, such as that of the Cretaceous massif of Abu Roash,[80] west of Cairo, which probably formed an island in the sea at that time; without doubt the great Eocene sea which covered the area stretched northwards, and was continuous with that in which the southern European deposits of this period were laid down. To the west also there was certainly no land-mass within approximate distances. Eastwards, possibly part of the Red Sea Hills igneous range may have formed a restricted land-area, but even this is not probable; in fact, it seems certain that we must look to the south for the nearest land of any extent. In supposing the land lay in this direction we are confronted at the outset with the fact that the Lower Eocene limestones stretch southwards for several hundred kilometres. In Egypt the Lower Eocene consists of a great mass of nummulitic limestones, some 400-500 metres thick, with no intercalated clays or sandstones except at the base, and was evidently formed in water of considerable depth. The thickness of, and superficial area covered by, these limestones show that they were formed in a truly open sea, in contra-distinction to a littoral area; the nummulitic sea in fact covered an enormous part of Europe, North Africa and Asia. To the south of this sea lay the African continent, a land-mass dating possibly from Palæozoic times. Since, and possibly partly during, the deposition of the Lower and Middle