The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
It is to “The Seasons” (1726–30) that we must go if we wish to
understand Thomson’s work as a poet of Nature. A brief analysis of the
study of external Nature in these poems will serve to show both in what
respects Thomson’s work was the outcome of a new spirit, and in what
respects its affiliations are with the old.
An important part of Thomson’s poetical endowment was his quick
sensitiveness to the sights and sounds and odors of the world
about him. He looked on Nature with the eye of an artist, but not
of an artist in black and white. It was not form but color that
attracted him. There are occasional descriptions, as of the garden
in “Spring”[273] and of the precious stones in “Summer,”[274] where
the lines glow like a painter’s palette, and throughout “The Seasons”
there is a general impression of rich and varied coloring. That this
impression is stronger than a list of the color terms used would seem
to justify is due to two facts, both characteristic of Thomson’s work
in general. In the first place he did not care for nicely discriminated
shades or delicate tints. He loved broad masses of strong, clear
color. He dwells with ever new delight on blue as seen in the sky or
reflected in water, and on green, “smiling Nature’s universal robe.”
In the second place he is especially rich in such words as indicate
color in general without specification as to the kind. “The flushing
year,” “every-coloured glory,” “the boundless blush of spring,” “the
innumerous-coloured scene of things,” “unnumbered dyes,” “hues on
hues,” are typical phrases. Motion also caught his eye more quickly
than form. The dancing light and shade in a forest pathway, the waving
of branches, the flow of water, the rapid flight or slow march of
clouds, the golden, shadowy sweep of wind over ripened grain, count
for much in the pleasurable impression made upon his mind by different
scenes.
It is evident that Thomson received more through his eye than through
his ear, but he was very far from being indifferent to the sounds of
Nature. The hum of bees, the low of cattle, the bleating of sheep are
frequently noted. The songs of birds, while often represented by some
general phase, as “the music of the woods,” or “woodland hymns,” are
now and then more minutely specified, as in the fine description of
the “symphony of spring.”[275] There is also effective representation
of the sounds heard in storms, as in the summer thunderstorm.[276] The
most frequent sounds are, as is inevitable in an English poet whose
facts come from actual observation, those made by water, as the plaint
of purling rills, the thunder of impetuous torrents, or the growling of
frost-imprisoned rivers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account