The Truth About Lynching and the Negro in the South: In Which the Author Pleads That the South Be Made Safe for the White RaceCollins, Winfield H. (Winfield Hazlitt)
History
The Truth About Lynching and the Negro in the South: In Which the Author Pleads That the South Be Made Safe for the White Race
Collins, Winfield H. (Winfield Hazlitt)
African Americans; Lynching; Southern States -- Race relations
So the cause of the Negro’s failure to secure a reasonable share
of wealth is not lack of opportunity,—for (at least, in the South)
he has every opportunity that he could wish in order to do so,—but
rather to his racial traits or characteristics,—some of which are:
a happy-go-lucky disposition, indolence, shiftlessness, laziness,
indifference, lack of mental stamina and ambition, and strong criminal
tendencies.
FOOTNOTES:
[123:1] _Baltimore Sun_, Dec. 18, 1909.
[124:2] _Liberator_, Jan. 20, 1854, and Nov. 9, 1860.
[124:3] _Ibid._, May 11, 1860; E. Collins, “Memories of the Southern
States,” p. 44.
[125:4] _Liberator_, March 18, 1859. Also, Olmsted, “Seaboard Slave
States,” pp. 633-640.
[128:5] The _Chicago Tribune_, Dec. 30, 1916, gives a list of gifts to
charity during 1916 as near $1,000,000,000.
[129:6] According to the census, “The average value of farm property
per acre was $27.01 for farms operated by Negroes in 1910 as compared
with $13.08 for 1900, and $47.72 for farms operated by whites in 1910.”
There was no indication whether all land or merely arable land is
meant. About three-fourths of the farms operated by Negroes are rented.
Observation convinces me that farms owned by Negroes are not more than
half so valuable an acre on the average as the land rented by them,
for from necessity they buy the least valuable land. This being true,
Negro lands in 1900 could not have been worth more than $6.00 an acre
and about $13.00 in 1910. However, in making any calculations as to
the value of Negro lands and property, I will take the Negro Year Book
estimate and apply it to all Negro land.
[130:7] Scott and Stowe, “Booker T. Washington,” p. 171.
[131:8] The estimate of $7.98 an acre in 1900, and $17.40 an acre
in 1910, according to the “Negro Year Book” mentioned above, is
undoubtedly too high by at least one-third, but I use it so as to give
them the advantage rather than otherwise. I know a body of 1,300 acres
of land in my own county, Dorchester, Md., consisting of some cleared
land, woodland and brushland, which a real estate man told me could be
bought at five dollars an acre. This is such land as the Negro usually
buys. Only a short distance from the body of land mentioned in this
note land is valued at from twenty-five to one hundred dollars an acre.
[131:9] Among the Negro business interests are 64 banks which are often
mentioned in Negro speeches. It seems, however, that two of them have
failed. The total capital of these banks is said to be $1,500,000.
In striking contrast are the 27,000 white banks with $2,162,900,000
capital. Petersburg, Negro settlement in Md., mentioned above, has two
Negro stores with hardly $100 worth of goods, each.
[133:10] I make no mention of the little personal property often not
taxed many poorer Negroes possess, for the reason that usually such
Negroes owe retail store keepers even more than their little property
would sell for.
[135:11] _New York Tribune_, Jan. 25, 1917.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account