Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
“My noble friend said: Why could you not make peace with Turkey,
cutting out all the non-Turkish territories, and then leaving
Constantinople and Anatolia to be dealt with?’ I think on
consideration he will see that is not possible. What is to be done
with Constantinople? What is to be done with the Straits?... If
those doors had been open, and if our fleet and our merchant ships
had been free to go through ... the war would have been shortened
by two or three years. They were shut treacherously in our faces.
We cannot trust the same porter. As to what will remain much
depended on whether America came in.... Would America take a share,
and, if so, what share? France has great burdens, Britain has great
burdens, Italy has great burdens. Much depended on whether America,
which has no great extraneous burdens, and which has gigantic
resources, was prepared to take her share.... But until America
declared what she would do, any attempt to precipitate the position
might have led to misunderstandings with America and would have
caused a good deal of suspicion, and we regard a good understanding
with America as something vital. That is the reason why we could
not make peace with Turkey....
“We are entitled to say now: ‘We have waited up to the very limits
we promised, and we have waited beyond that.’ The decision of
America does not look promising.... Therefore we consider now,
without any disrespect to our colleagues at the Peace Conference,
and without in the least wishing to deprive the United States of
America of sharing the honour of guardianship over these Christian
communities, that we are entitled to proceed to make peace with
Turkey, and we propose to do so at the earliest possible moment.
We have had some preliminary discussions on the subject. As far as
they went they were very promising. They will be renewed, partly in
this country, partly probably in France, in the course of the next
few days, and I hope that it will be possible to submit to Turkey
the terms of peace at an early date.”
But as the Allies, instead of dictating terms of peace to Turkey at
the end of 1918, had postponed the settlement of the Turkish question
for fourteen months, as they had dismissed the Ottoman delegation
after summoning it themselves, and as the question was now about to be
resumed under widely different circumstances and in quite another frame
of mind, the Paris Conference found itself in an awkward situation.
* * * * *
About the end of the first half of February, 1920, the Peace Conference
at last resumed the discussion of the Turkish question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account