The Two Tests: The Supernatural Claims of Christianity Tried by Two of Its Own RulesLisle, Lionel
Religion
The Two Tests: The Supernatural Claims of Christianity Tried by Two of Its Own Rules
Lisle, Lionel
Apologetics
Genesis iii. 15; Matt. iii. 17; xiii. 38; xxiii. 33; John viii. 44;
1 John iii. 8; Heb. ii. 14, 15; Kev. xii. 9; xx. 2. By believers that
Jesus is the Christ the passage in Genesis is held to be a prophecy that
received its fulfilment in him. He was the seed of the woman who bruised
the head of the serpent, by restoring that portion of the human race
who believe in him to the divine favour lost through the wiles of the
serpent. The serpent is Satan, his seed mankind in their natural state;
they bruised the heel (not a deadly part) of the seed of the woman by
crucifying Christ. Jesus, who merely laid down his life that he might
take it again, and thus expiated the sins of his people, in turn
bruised the head (a deadly part) of the serpent. Such is the meaning
of Genesis iii. 15, indicated by the writers of the New Testament four
thousand years after the words are said to have been uttered by God.
Will the passage then bear any such interpretation?
The serpent tempted Eve to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge
of good and evil; she induced her husband to do the same. For this the
three were sentenced thus:--
1. __The man, that he should eat bread by the sweat of his brow through
culture of the ground, cursed for his sake, until his return to the dust
from whence he came.
This is perfectly clear: it admits of no double interpretation.
2. _The woman_, that she should bring forth in pain, and be in
subjection to her husband.
This is also quite plain, and in accordance with natural fact, whether
the cause be the eating of the forbidden fruit or not.
3. _The serpent_, that he should go upon his belly, that he should eat
dust, that he should hate mankind, that mankind should hate him, that
men should bruise his head, that he should bruise men's heel.
Is there anything here beyond natural fact more than in the case of the
man or woman? Men trample on serpents, serpents bite men from heel to
knee; they cannot as a rule strike higher.
What else, then, can be said of all these passages, than that they are
exact descriptions of the lot on earth of men, women, and serpents,
whether or not caused by eating the forbidden fruit?
What is certain, however, is that this lot has not been reversed, or
even alleviated by the coming of Jesus. Men live on the fruits of the
ground brought forth by culture, until they decay and die; women bear
children in pain; serpents crawl along the ground as before. If these
are the works of the devil, why has Jesus not destroyed them? Why
since his advent do they exist as before? He has expiated guilt, he has
ascended into heaven, all power is his in heaven and in earth. Why then
does the devil still triumph on earth? Why do the so-called curses,
which the serpent's temptation of Eve brought, continue.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account