The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
History
The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]
Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
American loyalists; United Empire loyalists
As soon as the settlers had been placed on the townships to which they
had been assigned, they received their allotments of land. The surveyor
was the land agent, and the allotments were apportioned by each applicant
drawing a lot out of a hat. This democratic method of allotting lands
roused the indignation of some of the officers who had settled with their
men. They felt that they should have been given the front lots, unmindful
of the fact that their grants as officers were from five to ten times as
large as the grants which their men received. Their protests, contained
in a letter of Captain Grass to the governor, roused Haldimand to a
display of warmth to which he was as a rule a stranger. Captain Grass and
his associates, he wrote, were to get no special privileges, ‘the most
of them who came into the province with him being, in fact, mechanics,
only removed from one situation to practise their trade in another. Mr
Grass should, therefore, think himself very well off to draw lots in
common with the Loyalists.’ A good deal of difficulty arose also from the
fact that many allotments were inferior to the rest from an agricultural
point of view; but difficulties of this sort were adjusted by Johnson and
Holland on the spot.
By 1784 nearly all the settlers were destitute and completely dependent
on the generosity of the British government. They had no effects; they
had no money; and in many cases they were sorely in need of clothes. The
way in which Sir Frederick Haldimand came to their relief is deserving
of high praise. If he had adhered to the letter of his instructions from
England, the position of the Loyalists would have been a most unenviable
one. Repeatedly, however, Haldimand took on his own shoulders the
responsibility of ignoring or disobeying the instructions from England,
and trusted to chance that his protests would prevent the government from
repudiating his actions. When the home government, for instance, ordered
a reduction of the rations, Haldimand undertook to continue them in full;
and fortunately for him the home government, on receipt of his protest,
rescinded the order.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account