It had already been discovered that Sam Brattle had certainly been
out during the night. He had himself denied this at first, saying,
that though he had been the last to go to bed, he had gone to bed
about eleven, and had not left the mill-house till late in the
morning;--but his sister had heard him rise, and had seen his body
through the gloom as he passed beneath the window of the room in
which she slept. She had not heard him return, but, when she arose at
six, had found out that he was then in the house. He manifested no
anger against her when she gave this testimony, but acknowledged that
he had been out, that he had wandered up to the road, and explained
his former denial frankly,--or with well-assumed frankness,--by
saying that he would, if possible, for his father's and mother's
sake, have concealed the fact that he had been away,--knowing that
his absence would give rise to suspicions which would well-nigh break
their hearts. He had not, however,--so he said,--been any nearer
to Bullhampton than the point of the road opposite to the lodge of
Hampton Privets, from whence the lane turned down to the mill. What
had he been doing down there? He had done nothing, but sat and smoked
on a stile by the road side. Had he seen any strangers? Here he
paused, but at last declared that he had seen none, but had heard
the sound of wheels and of a pony's feet upon the road. The vehicle,
whatever it was, must have passed on towards Bullhampton just before
he reached the road. Had he followed the vehicle? No;--he had thought
of doing so, but had not. Could he guess who was in the vehicle? By
this time many surmises had been made aloud as to Jack the Grinder
and his companion, and it had become generally known that the
parson had encountered two such men in his own garden some nights
previously. Sam, when he was pressed, said that the idea had come
into his mind that the vehicle was the Grinder's cart. He had no
knowledge, he said, that the man was coming to Bullhampton on that
night;--but the man had said in his hearing, that he would like to
strip the parson's peaches. He was asked also about Farmer Trumbull's
money. He declared that he had never heard that the farmer kept money
in the house. He did know that the farmer was accounted to be a very
saving man,--but that was all that he knew. He was as much surprised,
he said, as any of them at what had occurred. Had the men turned the
other way and robbed the parson he would have been less surprised. He
acknowledged that he had called the parson a turn-coat and a meddling
tell-tale, in the presence of these men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account