The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
It is important, therefore, to be conscious of the arbitrary power
that makes this low degree of wealth permanent wealth. Because law has
decreed that it shall be in the highest class of wealth, then it comes
first amongst a bank’s assets, because this is the class of wealth that
in certain circumstances would have to satisfy the strongest of human
desires. Is it the wealth that a bank transforms? It is transformed,
because though it lies in a bank’s vaults, it is transformed into
the same substance as other wealth and thereby becomes fruitful. In
this manner it is able to multiply itself, not into gold, but into
other forms of wealth. It multiplies itself into gold indirectly by
stimulating and helping the production of it. When gold is brought to
the Bank of England and converted into notes, it performs the same
services as when it is taken to banks and is converted into that other
form of paper currency, cheques. The gold gets into circulation, and is
just as fruitful though it be circulated in the form of coin, instead
of notes. It makes no difference whether this gold is retained in the
vaults of the joint stock banks, or is placed in the keeping of the
Bank of England. In fact, if it is placed in the keeping of the Bank
of England, it can be made more fruitful, for the Bank of England
re-utilizes it, and increases the potential amount of currency based
upon it.
The next asset is the money at call and short notice. The money at
call is, as already explained, practically the money lent to bill
brokers, and forms a part of what is called a bank’s liquid reserve.
If in a time of grave urgency the bank “calls” this money from the
bill brokers, it simultaneously “calls” in its loan deposits. It
is understood that in those moments the brokers would be unable to
repay their loans if they could not get the money from the banks. If,
therefore, they cannot get the money from the banks, how can this
portion of the deposits be withdrawable from the banks? If they were
withdrawn, they would have to be paid in again the moment they were
withdrawn.
We know that in those times, however, the loans would be called and the
bill-brokers would have to borrow the money from the Bank of England.
And this money being paid over to the creditor bank, the deposits would
automatically fall, and the proportion of the gold reserve to the other
deposits would automatically rise.
It is a conviction in Lombard Street that in those times the
bill-brokers could get no money from the joint stock banks. That being
so, what is called the credit superstructure does not appear to be so
unwieldy as it looks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account