The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
Up to the nineteenth century, the Balkan Peninsula was owned by
Turkey, but the last century has witnessed the gradual break-up of
European Turkey on the Balkan Peninsula. In connection with this
disintegration, Russia tried to gain territory at the expense of
Turkey. Austria-Hungary also tried to penetrate the same area. A
conflict was the inevitable consequence. This Balkan problem had
been a source of trouble in Europe for a century. The people of
Serbia were Slavs and looked to Russia for support,--in fact, Serbia
was practically governed by Russian diplomacy. Austria-Hungary
looked to Germany for support. In 1908, Bosnia, which was then a
Turkish province but had been administered by Austria-Hungary since
1878, was annexed by Austria-Hungary. This act offended Serbia, who
wished to annex it as part of the Pan-Slavic dream for the domination
by Russia of Bosnia, Serbia, and the remainder of the Balkans. This
annexation by Austria-Hungary defeated the Pan-Slavic dream and was a
victory for Pan-Germany. Feeling became more and more acute when in
1914 the Archduke Ferdinand was killed. The incident was applauded
by Serbia, and conflict followed. The details of events in 1914 are
too complicated to go into for our brief space, but popular accounts
reaching the United States were from Allied sources and were
correspondingly biased.
In 1914 all Europe was divided into two great military camps--the
Allied and the Central Powers. The following is the size of the
principal armies of Europe in 1914: Germany, 806,000; Austria,
370,000; Italy, 305,000; France, 818,000; Russia, 1,284,000; Belgium,
280,000. All Europe was equipped as a military machine, and the
murder in 1914 simply put the machinery in motion. It was an absurd
fallacy to think that Germany was the only armed nation at the time,
and to believe that Great Britain entered the conflict to defend
Belgium is equally absurd. As early as 1911, Great Britain had made
plans with France for marching an army through Belgium to Germany in
the event of war with Germany. Belgium was regarded as part of the
Allied powers. Great Britain has officially acknowledged to be false
her ostensible reason for entering the war--the protection of
Belgium. Her reason was the struggle between rival imperialisms,
which secret treaties later exposed show clearly.
However, we are concerned here only with why the United States
entered the war. The three outstanding causes were interference with
neutral trade, economic ties with the Allies, and Allied propaganda
in the United States. These causes overlap in such a way as to make
it impossible to discuss them separately.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account