The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
The essential difficulties in the situation as it obtained at this
time are manifest. The Huguenots declared the King to be a captive in
the hands of the Guises and themselves claimed to be loyal subjects
in rebellion against tyranny.[518] The Guises, on the other hand,
branded the Huguenots as rebels and schismatics, although Catherine de
Medici still had a lingering hope of restoring peace, and in official
utterances carefully refrained from alluding to the prince of Condé as
a rebel.[519] Neither side would agree to lay down its arms without
the other doing likewise, and neither dared take the initiative in
this matter. The situation, therefore, was an irreconcilable one,
which nothing but war could settle. The political determinations of
the Huguenots were quite as fixed as their religious convictions, for
part of their platform was the article agreed upon by the estates
at Orleans to the effect that the cardinal of Lorraine, the duke of
Guise, the constable, and the marshals Brissac and St. André, should
render an account of their stewardship.[520] How far politics governed
the situation is evidenced by the fact that late in April the king of
Navarre and Montmorency began to weaken in their attitude when it was
known that Condé dominated the middle Loire country, Touraine, Maine,
Anjou, and much of Normandy; when it was learned that the cities of
Lyons,[521] Toulouse, Caen, Rouen,[522] Dieppe, Troyes, Bourges,[523]
and the provinces of Dauphiné, Provence, and Poitou, had declared
for the Huguenot cause; and when troops were pouring into Orleans by
thousands.[524]
If the Guises and the marshals Brissac and St. André could have
acquitted themselves with so little discredit as Antoine of Bourbon
or the constable, it is possible that a compromise might have been
made even yet.[525] But such an issue was impossible under the
circumstances. The guilt of Vassy still hung over the duke, for he had
not yet been absolved either by the Court of Parlement or by the peers
of France. Having appealed to force, force remained the only method
of settling the great dispute that divided France, and Guise daily
assembled horse and foot in Paris in expectation of battle.[526]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account