The West Riding Territorials in the Great WarMagnus, Laurie
History
The West Riding Territorials in the Great War
Magnus, Laurie
Great Britain. Army. Division, 49th; Great Britain. Army. Division, 62nd; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
If the courage
displayed in these encounters had been combined for the united effort
which was intended, no troops born of woman could have withstood it. The
record of every fighting unit tells the same tale of desperate valour;
of a few exhausted and staggering survivors hardly able to remember
their own exploits, of endurance strained to the limit of capacity, and
of unwilling admiration extorted even from a grudging foe. But the net
result on May 9th was failure; it was necessary to retire and to repair,
and the part of the West Riding units, to their own deep disappointment,
was confined to occasional supporting fire, to relief-duty in the
trenches, marked by little more than its normal dangers, and, on the
whole, to a comparatively quiet day.
This battle of Fromelles, or of Aubers Ridge, which had the indirect
success of engaging sufficient German forces to assist the French advance
to Carency, was renewed a week later at Festubert, and was not broken off
till May 26th. ‘I had now reason,’ wrote Sir John French in his Seventh
Dispatch, ‘to consider that the battle, which was commenced by the First
Army on the 9th May and renewed on the 16th, having attained for the
moment the immediate object I had in view, should not be further actively
proceeded with; and I gave orders to Sir Douglas Haig to curtail his
artillery attack and to strengthen and consolidate the ground he had won
... on a front of four miles to an average depth of 600 yards.’ We may
add that, if Lille was not taken, Ypres, too, with its narrower front,
still stood with its back to the wall; and behind that wall lay the
Channel ports. Moreover, the southern approach had been partially blocked
by the reduction of the German salient from Lens, and the fighting
quality of our troops was such as to deter the enemy from attempting a
break-through on one line without adequate resources on the rest. In
other words, a see-saw movement was the chief obvious conclusion from the
six weeks’ spurts of battle-fury to the east and south-east of Ypres. A
new direct frontal attack would mean a new risk to Lens and on to Lille;
a new attempt to throw out the Lens salient would mean a protrusion of
the British salient from the Yser Canal. The third or middle course was
to accept stalemate; and to the limited but useful extent of forcing this
decision on the enemy, the heroes of the Second Battle of Ypres, of the
French pocket-battles in the Artois, and of the British struggles round
Aubers and Festubert are entitled to the full measure of their renown.
Moreover, taking a wider survey, the stalemate suited the combatants
on other accounts besides exhaustion. Germany was waging war on two
fronts. Having pushed her western pieces into positions, in which, save
for minor attacks, they might be left undisturbed for a time, she was
anxious to concentrate on the east. England, too, had another foe, whom
it might be too late to overtake unless she set about the work at once.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account