The Witchcraft Delusion in New England: Its Rise, Progress, and Termination (Vol. 2 of 3)Mather, Cotton
History
The Witchcraft Delusion in New England: Its Rise, Progress, and Termination (Vol. 2 of 3)
Mather, Cotton
Witchcraft -- New England
His first main Work is after his definition of a Witch, which he never
proves (without saying any thing to Mr. _Gauls_ Scriptural description,
tho' so often urged to it, and tho' himself has in his Book recommended
and quoted it) is to magnifie the Devils Power, and that as I think
beyond and against the Scripture, this takes him up about 11 _Pages_,
and yet in _Page_ 22 again returns to it, and as I understand it, takes
part with the _Pharisees_ against our Saviour in the Argument, for they
charge him that he cast out Devils thro' _Beelzebub_, Our Saviours
Answer is, _Mat._ xii. 25. _Every Kingdom divided against itself is
brought to desolation; and every City or House divided against itself,
shall not stand, and if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against
himself, how shall then his Kingdom stand_: And yet notwithstanding
this Answer together with what follows, for further Illustration, our
Author is it seems resolved to assert that our Saviour did not in this
Answer deny that many did so, (_viz._) cast out Devils by _Beelzebub_,
and _Page_ 23 grants that the Devils have a Miraculous Power, but
yet must not be call'd miracles, and yet can be distinguished, as he
intimates, only by the Conscience or Light within, to the no small
scandal of the Christian Religion.
Tho' our Saviour and his Apostles accounts this the chief or principal
proof of his Godhead, _John_ xx. 30, 31. _John_ x. 37, 38. _John_ v.
30. _Mark_ xvi. 17, 18. _Acts_ ii. 22. and iv. 30. with many others
and that Miracles belong only to God, who also Governs the World,
_Psal._ cxxxvi. 4. _Jer._ xiv. 22. _Isa._ xxxviii. 8. _Psal._ lxii.
11. _Lam._ iii. 37. _Amos_ iii. 6. [32] But to forbear quoting that
which the Scripture is most full in, do only say that he that dares
assert the Devil to have such a Miraculous Power had need have other
Scriptures than ever I have seen. In _Page_ 12. our Author proceeds
and states a question to this effect, If the Devil has such Powers,
and cant exert them without permission from God, what can the Witch
contribute thereunto? Instead of an Answer, to this weighty objection,
our Author first concedes that the Devil's do ordinarily exert their
Powers, without the Witches contributing to it, but yet that to the end
to increase their guilt he may cheat a Witch, by making her believe
herself the Author of them.[58] His next is, if Witchcraft be, as I
suppose it is, the skill of applying the Plastic Spirit of the World,
_&c._ then the consent of the Witch doth naturally contribute to
that mischiefs that the Devil does. And his last answer runs to this
effect, Is it not the Ordination of God, that where the Devil can get
the consent of a Witch for the hurting of others, the hurt shall as
certainly be as if they had set Mastiff Dogs upon them, or had given
them Poyson into their Bowels; and Gods Providence must be as great in
delivering from one as from the other, and this it seems is not only
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account