The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
It should be remarked that if the physicians had the good sense not to
quarrel with the formidable power of women, but to come to terms, that
result was probably due to the fact that they were themselves in the
throes of a crisis which could not but inspire them with great prudence.
People were up in arms against them; they were no longer content with
rehashing stale jokes;[49] the sick expected to be cured. Further,
complete discord reigned in the scientific world; men vied with each
other in flinging about opprobrious epithets like “fool,” “mountebank,”
and “specialist.” Paris remained faithful to the traditional and
philosophic spirit, while Paracelsus burnt the works of Galen and
Avicenna. Many men dismissed medicine as a purely empirical science with
no theory behind it, and capable of being mastered in six months. The
activity in scientific circles only added to the intellectual confusion.
Opinion went so far as to hold doctors responsible for their actions, and
to maintain that their repute should be strictly proportionate to their
merits.[50] There were not wanting sceptics, even among women. Margaret
of France, in one of her comedies, brings on the scene a sick man who,
after being tossed about like a shuttlecock between his doctor and his
wife, is ultimately cured through the prayers of the cook.
Nevertheless, a real bond of friendship and brotherhood was in most
cases established between the lady and this stranger who called himself
a doctor. It was a sort of domestic and personal intimacy. Women, as we
all know, are greatly in need of a directing authority; they love also
to be made much of, as certain doctors understood wonderfully well;
like that doctor who never met a woman without attempting to worm out
of her some confidences as to her health, and when someone expressed
his astonishment, “Aha!” said he, waggling his head, “even well-corked
bottles sometimes have cracks.” In reality, he fancied that his
solicitude would be highly appreciated.
The doctor who won a lady’s esteem became her friend. He would write to
her asking how she was, and addressing her as “my sweet princess”; if he
learnt of her illness, he flew to her; if she died, he mourned her. His
sentiments sometimes outran his interests; a noble lady died, and among
her effects were found formidable doctor’s bills she had forgotten to
settle. If in special cases there were limits to the confidence patients
placed in their doctor’s skill, there remained still a vast enough field
for private friendship, which lent itself only too well to scandal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account