The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 08 (of 12): Dresden Edition—InterviewsIngersoll, Robert Green
Religion
The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 08 (of 12): Dresden Edition—Interviews
Ingersoll, Robert Green
Free thought
It has been demonstrated by Dr. Tanner to be utterly without
foundation. What possible good did it do the world for Christ to
go without food for forty days? Why should we follow such an
example? As a rule, hungry people are cross, contrary, obstinate,
peevish and unpleasant. A good dinner puts a man at peace with
all the world--makes him generous, good natured and happy. He
feels like kissing his wife and children. The future looks bright.
He wants to help the needy. The good in him predominates, and he
wonders that any man was ever stingy or cruel. Your good cook is
a civilizer, and without good food, well prepared, intellectual
progress is simply impossible. Most of the orthodox creeds were
born of bad cooking. Bad food produced dyspepsia, and dyspepsia
produced Calvinism, and Calvinism is the cancer of Christianity.
Oatmeal is responsible for the worst features of Scotch Presbyterianism.
Half cooked beans account for the religion of the Puritans. Fried
bacon and saleratus biscuit underlie the doctrine of State Rights.
Lent is a mistake, fasting is a blunder, and bad cooking is a crime.
_Question_. It is stated that you went to Brooklyn while Beecher
and Talmage were holding revivals, and that you did so for the
purpose of breaking them up. How is this?
_Answer_. I had not the slightest idea of interfering with the
revivals. They amounted to nothing. They were not alive enough
to be killed. Surely one lecture could not destroy two revivals.
Still, I think that if all the persons engaged in the revivals had
spent the same length of time in cleaning the streets, the good
result would have been more apparent. The truth is, that the old
way of converting people will have to be abandoned. The Americans
are getting hard to scare, and a revival without the "scare" is
scarcely worth holding. Such maniacs as Hammond and the "Boy
Preacher" fill asylums and terrify children. After saying what he
has about hell, Mr. Beecher ought to know that he is not the man
to conduct a revival. A revival sermon with hell left out--with
the brimstone gone--with the worm that never dies, dead, and the
Devil absent--is the broadest farce. Mr. Talmage believes in the
ancient way. With him hell is a burning reality. He can hear the
shrieks and groans. He is of that order of mind that rejoices in
these things. If he could only convince others, he would be a
great revivalist. He cannot terrify, he astonishes. He is the
clown of the horrible--one of Jehovah's jesters. I am not responsible
for the revival failure in Brooklyn. I wish I were. I would have
the happiness of knowing that I had been instrumental in preserving
the sanity of my fellow-men.
_Question_. How do you account for these attacks?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account