The works of the Rev. Isaac Watts, D. D. in nine volumes (volume 1 of 9)Watts, Isaac
Religion
The works of the Rev. Isaac Watts, D. D. in nine volumes (volume 1 of 9)
Watts, Isaac
Dissenters, Religious -- England; Sermons, English -- 18th century; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
1. The religion of the _Heathens_, and the best of philosophers, could
never assure us, _Whether God would pardon sin at all, or no_. The light
of nature indeed would dictate thus much, that God is, in his own
nature, gracious, and compassionate, and kind; but whether God would be
gracious to you or me, compassionate to such ill-deserving sinners, as
we are, the light of nature could never determine. It is only the Son of
God, that came down from the bosom of the Father, could so well inform
us how the Father’s heart worked towards such sinners, in the designs of
pardon and reconciliation.
2. Again, the light of nature could never tell us, _how often God would
pardon sinners_. Suppose it could be found out by reason that God is so
compassionate, that he could forgive offences, yet it could never be
inferred how often we would be forgiven; and if he had pardoned us once,
we might for ever despair if we had committed new iniquities: For who
but a divine messenger can tell us, that he will often repeat his
pardons?
3. The light of nature could never inform us _how great the offences
were that could be forgiven_; reason could never tell us, that
rebellions of the biggest size, and treasons of the blackest
aggravation, should be all cancelled; the light of nature could never
say, _All manner of sin, and blasphemy, shall be forgiven to men_. This
the Son of God hath only taught us, who came from the bosom of the
Father, and who laid a foundation for the brightest displays of
pardoning grace.
4. Reason, with all the principles of natural religion, could never
teach us _what we must do to obtain pardon_, and on what terms God would
forgive. Reason indeed might require us to repent of sin, but it could
never assure us, that _he that confesseth, and forsaketh his sins, shall
find mercy_. Nor could it shew us any mediator or reconciler between God
and man, nor how, or in what manner, we must address ourselves to him,
or to an offended God by him; reason could never start a thought of this
strange way of salvation, that we must believe, or trust in another’s
sufferings in order to the pardon of our own sins; that we must depend
on the merits and righteousness of one that died, in order to obtain
forgiveness and life; that _by faith, in the blood of Christ, God will
justify them that believe in Jesus_? What could the light of mere nature
teach us concerning this Jesus? And yet _there is no other name under
heaven whereby we can be saved_; Acts iv. 12.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account