The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
In administering his domains, Alexander showed great conservatism; he
made few changes, he allowed each of the countries which acknowledged
the Great King as its overlord to retain its particular institutions.
One important modification he did introduce into the loosely organized
and haphazard Persian system of rule, the division of power. The
Persian satrap was generally the sole governor, having in his hands the
civil, military, and financial administration. Alexander limited him to
matters of internal administration, appointing a financial officer and
a military commander armed with considerable powers. After the return
from India, there was a further innovation made by the appointment of
a Chiliarch, as the supreme director and head of the provinces, with
a place immediately after the monarch himself. This official was a
part of the governmental machinery of the Persian Empire, holding in
it the place of a Grand Vizier. It was given to Alexander’s friend,
Hephæstion, but after his death it was left vacant. The most trusted
servant, the actual head of the administration, was the Chief Secretary
Eumenes from Cardia, a man of first-rate military and civil capacity;
he was unfailingly loyal to his master, and after Alexander’s death,
suffered many vicissitudes because of his devotion to the Macedonian
royal house.
Alexander was not satisfied with the rôle of conqueror; he wished to
give his rule in the East that trait of legitimacy which the popular
Oriental mind required as a stimulus to its loyalty. It was impossible
for him to be King of Persia by the grace of God, for it was the might
of his own hand, not the right of succession, that constituted him the
heir of Darius. This Gordian knot of politics he solved in his own
direct fashion by directing that divine honors should be paid to him
by the subject populations. The custom of apotheosis originated in
Egypt, but it was not alien to Greek thought, according to which no
deep distinction existed between man and divinity. The mythical heroes
of the Greek people, whom all allowed to have once been men, were
everywhere honored with altars and sacrifice. Asclepius and Herakles
sat on Olympus with the greater divinities of a purely spiritual
origin. It had become not unusual in the age preceding Alexander
to accord divine honors to the living. Such had been the case with
Clearchus of Heracleia who had been greeted as the son of Zeus, and
with Dionysius the Younger who had caused himself to be honored at
Syracuse as the son of Apollo. Alexander’s achievements, far greater in
comparison, gave him a right to this distinction during his lifetime;
his divine origin had, besides, been attested by the Erythrian Sibyl
and by the oracle at Branchidæ; with this theological and official
stamp all that remained to be done was to give the accepted belief a
concrete form. The cult of the conqueror became a part of the state
religion in the Greek communities throughout the empire. Whether
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account