The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
His enthusiasm for absolutism was, when one considers his age and
how deeply he was involved in military plans and schemes, less of a
reflection on himself than a curse to his followers and successors,
who kept faithful to the personal tradition of their leader and made
the Hellenization of Asia untrue to so much that was best in Greek
political life and thought. It was, as Ranke says, a break in their
whole national history, for the Greeks to have extended over them the
kind of authority which was in no way different from that against which
they had contended in warfare for a century. But it must be remembered
that Alexander had only just begun to rule over Asiatics; he had
receded before his death from pressing his theory of amalgamation to
its logical conclusion, and quick as he was to feel instinctively the
meaning of new conditions, it may be fairly supposed that he would have
come to recognize the value of Aristotle’s profoundly wise advice to
him, that he should behave to the Greeks as a leader or president and
to the barbarians or non-Greeks as a master.
We may put to one side all the ingenious speculations as to what might
have happened if Alexander had reached the ordinary limit of human
life, a line of thought which Livy seems to have originated, when he
tried to foretell for his age what would have happened if Alexander
had taken up the rôle followed later by his relative, Pyrrhus. It is
only necessary to say that, so far as Greek affairs were concerned,
Alexander was the son of his father. His public career began when, as
Philip’s son, he put the finishing touches to Philip’s program for
dominating the free states of Greece. So long as Alexander lived, the
lines of Macedonian supremacy, the outcome of the battle of Chæronea,
remained clear and fixed. The destruction of Thebes was but the
epilogue of Philip’s own career. The sentimental vein in the nature of
Alexander made him patient with the somewhat childish and ineffective
hostility shown him by both Athens and Sparta, venerable names as
protagonists in the secular struggle with the Persians, whose mantle
had now fallen on his broader shoulders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account