Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Superficial also is his objection, that “it is always the case when a
man against whom a plot is formed, and who comes to the knowledge of it,
makes known to the conspirators that he is acquainted with their design,
that the latter are turned from their purpose, and keep upon their
guard.” For many have continued to plot even against those who were
acquainted with their plans. And then, as if bringing his argument to a
conclusion, he says: “Not because these things were predicted did they
come to pass, for that is impossible; but since they have come to pass,
their being predicted is shown to be a falsehood: for it is altogether
impossible that those who heard beforehand of the discovery of their
designs, should carry out their plans of betrayal and denial!” But if
his premisses are overthrown, then his conclusion also falls to the
ground, viz. “that we are not to believe, because these things were
predicted, that they have come to pass.” Now we maintain that they not
only came to pass as being possible, but also that, because they came to
pass, the fact of their being predicted is shown to be true; for the
truth regarding future events is judged of by results. It is false,
therefore, as asserted by him, that the prediction of these events is
proved to be untrue; and it is to no purpose that he says, “It is
altogether impossible for those who heard beforehand that their designs
were discovered, to carry out their plans of betrayal and denial.”
Chapter XX.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account