The Chinese scholar Hu Shih skillfully pinpoints why the social success
of Shen-hui's new "Southern" school in the north actually contributed
to its decline. As he saw it: "The explanation is simple. Zennism could
not flourish as an officially patronized religion, but only as an
attitude of mind, a method of thinking and a mode of living. An
officially patronized teacher of Buddhism is obliged to perform all the
traditional rituals and ceremonies which the true Zennist despises.
Shen-hui succeeded in establishing Zennism as a state religion, but by
so doing he almost killed it. All further development of Chinese Zen
had to come from those great teachers who valued simple life and
intellectual freedom and independence more than worldly recognition."3
And in fact just such teachers had begun springing up like mushrooms.
On lonely mountaintops, teachers of sudden enlightenment were
experimenting with new ways to transmit wordless insight. They seem to
have despised traditional Buddhism, perhaps partly because Buddhism--by
which is meant the cultural elitists and aristocrats in the capitals of
Ch'ang-an and Loyang--had so long despised them. (Recall the Fifth
Patriarch's greeting to Hui-neng: "If you're from the south, you must
be a barbarian.") Although traditional Buddhism (including teachers of
_dhyana_) continued to flourish, and the city of Ch'ang-an remained a
model for Asian civilization, the political power of the T'ang
government in the north gradually withered. And as it declined, so too
did the fortunes of the traditional Ch'an establishments that had
flourished under imperial patronage.
The new Ch'an teachers of the Southern school may have felt smug in
their new prestige and independence, but they still were subject to the
ingrained Chinese desire for a lineage. (Perhaps in the land of
Confucius, spiritual ancestors were essential to dignity.) The triumph
of the legend of Hui-neng in the north had not been lost on the
Ch'anists elsewhere, and it effectively meant that for any Ch'an school
to have respectability nationwide, it had to be able to trace its
lineage back to this illiterate southerner and his temple at Ts'ao-
ch'i. Unfortunately this turned out to be difficult, since by the time
Hui-neng actually came to be recognized as the Sixth Patriarch, he had
been dead for half a century and there were few Chinese who even knew
firsthand of his existence--and none besides Shen-hui who ever claimed
to have studied under him. How then could he be made the founder of the
Ch'an schools blooming all over China?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account