The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
Now the almost entire lower jaw about to be described offers, in so far
as respects the general form and structure of the teeth, the same kind
and degree of correspondence with the _Megatherium_, as does the
_Megalonyx Jeffersonii_ of Cuvier: and, what is only probable in that
species, is here certain, viz., an agreement with the Megatherium in the
class, viz. _molares_, to which the teeth exclusively belong. The
question, therefore, on which I find myself, in the outset, called upon
to come to a decision is, as to the preference of the mode of viewing
the subject of the generic relationship of the _Megalonyx_ adopted by
Desmarest, Fischer, &c., or of that, on which Cuvier, and after him Dr.
Harlan, have practically acted: whether, in short, the genus
_Megatherium_ is to rest upon the more comprehensive characters of kind
and general structure of the teeth, or upon the more restricted ones, of
form and such modifications in the disposition and proportions of the
component textures of the tooth, as give rise to the characteristic
appearances of the triturating surface of the crown.
With respect to existing Mammalia, most naturalists of the present day
seem to be unanimous as to the convenience at least of founding a
generic or subgeneric distinction on well-marked modifications in the
form and structure of the teeth, although they may correspond in number
and kind, in proof of which it needs only to peruse the pages of a
_Systema Mammalium_ which relate to the distribution of the Rodent
Order. According to this mode of viewing the logical abstractions under
which species are grouped together, the extinct Edentate Mammal
discovered by Jefferson must be referred to a genus distinct from
_Megatherium_, and for which the term _Megalonyx_ should be retained.
This will be sufficiently evident by comparing the descriptions given by
Cuvier of one of the teeth of the _Megalonyx Jeffersonii_, and by Dr.
Harlan of a tooth of his _Megalonyx laqueatus_, with those of the
_Megatherium_ which have been published by Mr. Clift. The fragment of
the molar tooth of the _Megalonyx Jeffersonii_, described and figured in
the _Ossemens Fossiles_, seems to have been implanted in the jaw, like
the teeth of the _Megatherium_, by a simple hollow base similar in form
and size to the protruded crown: its structure Cuvier describes as
consisting of a central cylinder of bone enveloped in a sheath of
enamel.[35] The transverse section of this tooth presents an irregular
elliptical form, the external contour being gently and uniformly convex,
the internal one, undulating; convex in the middle, and slightly concave
on each side, arising from the tooth being traversed longitudinally on
its inner side by two wide and shallow depressions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account