The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
The principal parts of the cranium which are deficient are the anterior
extremities of both the upper and lower jaws, the os frontis, æthmoid
bone, and the whole upper part of the facial division of the skull; but
sufficient remains to show that the general form of the skull resembled
an elongated, slender, subcompressed cone, commencing behind by a
flattened vertical base, slightly expanding to the zygomatic region, and
thence gradually contracting in all its dimensions to the anterior
extremity.
The Cape Ant-eater (_Orycteropus_), of all Edentata, most nearly
resembles the present fossil in the form of its cranium, and next in
this comparison the great Armadillo (_Dasypus gigas_, Cuv.) may be
cited: on the supposition, therefore, that the correspondence with the
above existing Edentals observable in the parts of the fossil cranium
which do exist, was carried out through those which are defective, the
length of the skull of the Scelidothere must have been not less than two
feet. If now the reader will turn to Pl. XX. he will see that this
cranium is singularly small and slender in proportion to the rest of the
skeleton, especially the bulky pelvis and femur, of which bones the
latter has a length of seventeen inches, and a breadth of not less than
nine inches; the astragalus, again, exceeds in bulk that of the largest
Hippopotamus or Rhinoceros; yet the condition of the epiphyseal
extremities of the long bones proves the present fossils to have
belonged to an immature animal. Hence, although the Scelidothere, like
most other Edentals, was of low stature, and, like the Megatherium,
presented a disproportionate development of the hinder parts, it is
probable, that, bulk for bulk, it equalled, when alive, the largest
existing pachyderms, not proboscidian. There is no evidence that it
possessed a tesselated osseous coat of mail.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account