The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 2 of 5] : $b MammaliaWaterhouse, G. R. (George Robert)
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 2 of 5] : $b Mammalia
Waterhouse, G. R. (George Robert)
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals; Zoology
This species is nearly equal in size to the common rat (_Mus
decumanus_). Of its skull[23] I possess but the anterior portion (see
Pl. 33. fig. 3, _a._ and 3, _b._): it appears to have been about the
same size as that of _M. decumanus_, its proportions, however, are
different: the nasal portion is broader and shorter, the ant-orbital
outlet is rather smaller; the plate, forming the anterior root of the
zygomatic arch, and which protects this outlet, has its anterior edge
distinctly emarginated, and not nearly straight as in _M.
decumanus_,—the zygomatic arch is stouter, the space between the orbits
is narrower, the palate is more contracted, the incisors are much
broader, less deep from front to back, and have the anterior surface
more convex; the molar teeth are larger; the lower jaw (see Plate 34.
fig. 12, _a._) when compared with that of _Mus decumanus_ also offers
many points of dissimilarity; the principal differences consist in its
greater strength, the comparatively large size and breadth of the
articular surface of the condyles, the upright position of the coronoid
process—a perpendicular line dropt from the apex of which would touch
the posterior part of the last molar—and the great extent of the
_symphysis menti_. In the form of the incisors, the more contracted
palate, the great extent of the _symphysis menti_, and in fact in most
of the points of dissimilarity, between the skull of the present animal
and that of _Mus decumanus_, here pointed out, it will be perceived,
there is an approach made to the _Arvicolidæ_.
The dimensions of the skull (so far as an imperfect specimen will allow
of their being taken) are as follows:—
In. Lines.
Distance between front of incisors, (upper jaw) and the
first molar tooth 0 8
Longitudinal extent of the three molars on either side,
taken together 0 4¼
Length of nasal bones 0 7¼
—— of incisive _foramina_ 0 4¼
Width between orbits 0 2½
Length of _ramus_ of lower jaw 1 1¼
Fig. 3, _c_, Plate 33, represents the molar teeth of the upper jaw. Fig.
3, _d_, those of the upper jaw.
“This rat was caught at Bahia Blanca where the plains of Patagonia begin
to blend into the more fertile region of the Pampas. It lived in holes
amongst the tussocks of rushes, on the borders of a small, still, brook;
in its manner of diving and aquatic habits it closely resembled the
English water-rat, (_Arvicola amphibia_.)”—D.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account