The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 2 of 5] : $b MammaliaWaterhouse, G. R. (George Robert)
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 2 of 5] : $b Mammalia
Waterhouse, G. R. (George Robert)
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals; Zoology
When at Paris I examined what I believe to be the original _Mus
Braziliensis_, since the specimen was labelled “_Rat de Brazil St.
Hilaire, 1818_.” It agrees perfectly with the present animal excepting
in being rather smaller, the length from the nose to the tail being 7
inches and 4 lines—the length of the tail is 7 inches 9 lines, and that
of the tarsus is 1 inch 11 lines; this difference in the length of the
body may arise from difference of age, or even of sex. In the Paris
Museum I saw what appeared to me to be a variety of the same species in
which the under parts of the body are white.
I have been minute in my description of the _Mus Braziliensis_, since it
is confounded by Desmarest, Fischer and Lesson with the _Rat troisieme_
or _Rat Angouya_ of Azara, which I believe to be a very different
animal. The description given by the authors just mentioned are taken
from Azara, who gives the following characters to distinguish the _Rat
Angouya_: “Du museau à la queue, et sur les côtés du corps tout est
brun-cannelle, parceque les poils ont une petite pointe cannelle; puis,
ils sont obscurs et enfin blanc vers las peau. Toute la partie
inférieure de l’animal est blanchâtre, plus claire sous la tête, et plus
foncée entre les jambes de devant; le pelage est doux, très-serr, et le
poil, qui est à la racine de l’oreille, cache le conduit de celle-ci.”
In. Lines.
Length from nose to root of tail (English measure) 6 0
of tail 6 6½
of ears 0 9¾
of tarsus (the claws included) 1 3¼
It appears from this description that the _Mus Angouya_ is a smaller
animal, and differs both in colouring and proportions from the _Mus
Braziliensis_. Brandt has figured and described a rat under the name of
_Mus Angouya_, which in many respects agrees better with Azara’s
description; there are, however, discrepancies in the dimensions.
22. MUS MICROPUS.
PLATE XX.
Mus micropus, _Waterh._, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of
London for February 1837, p. 17.
_M. suprà fuscus; subtùs cinerescenti-albus, pallidè flavo tinctus;
pedibus pilis sordidè albis tectis, antipedibus parvulis; auribus
parvulis; caudâ, quoad longitudinem, corpus ferè æquante, suprâ
fuscâ, subtùs sordidè albâ._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account