Three Apostles of Quakerism: Popular Sketches of Fox, Penn and BarclayRhodes, Benjamin
History
Three Apostles of Quakerism: Popular Sketches of Fox, Penn and Barclay
Rhodes, Benjamin
Barclay, Robert, 1648-1690; Fox, George, 1624-1691; Penn, William, 1644-1718; Society of Friends
For six years after his restoration to his rights, Penn was content to
leave Pennsylvania in the hands of his cousin, Colonel Markham. His
principal employments then were literary and ministerial.
In 1694, we find him using his new-found liberty to preach in the West
of England. His standing in the Society of Friends had been re-assured;
the usual certificate given by the brethren to all their preachers who
travel, stating that he was a "minister in unity and good esteem among
us," could be freely given, and he visited his brethren with comfort
and acceptance. He travelled, therefore, in the Western counties,
"having meetings almost daily in the most considerable towns and other
places in those counties, to which the people flocked abundantly;
and his testimony to the truth answering to that of God in their
consciences was assented to by many." We are told that the Mayors of
these towns generally consented to their having the Town Halls for
their meetings, "for the respect they had for him, few places else
being sufficient to hold the meetings." Returning to London, he had
a more painful duty to perform, which the following extract from a
contemporary letter describes.
Henry Gouldney, of London, to Robert Barclay, junr.,
28th of 12th mo., 1694.
"Being now a writing, I think it not unfit to acquaint
thee in a brief hint what passed at Ratcliff meeting, last
First-day (Sunday) week, where was William Penn, John
Vaughton, and George Keith. The latter having had no time
till the breaking up of the meeting, he then desired to
be heard. Friends all stayed. After a short appologie, he
fell a reflecting on the manner of John Vaughton's going
to prayer, calling it a hasty sacrifice, comparing to
Saul's. Then he fell upon doctrinall points, reflecting on
our unsoundness, particularly the epistle of John i. 7;
saying that the blood there mentioned was by us preacht
only misticall, whereas, he affirmed, it had no such
signification, neither did any there say to the contrary.
In short, the tendency of all he said was to expose Friends
as unsound. 'Twas a great and mixt meeting. William Penn
grew uneasy; after about a quarter-of-an-hour, he stood up,
saying to this purpose, 'In the name of the Lord, he was
concerned to sound the truth over the head of this apostate
and common opposer.' After a few words, George Keith was
silent. William Penn opened to the people our belief of the
virtue and efficacy of the blessed blood shed on the Cross;
and also shewed the people the reason why we did not so
frequently press Christ's death and sufferings as in the
Apostles' days, they being concerned among such as believed
not his outward coming, but among Christiandom was the
notion generally held, but that of the inward denied and
opposed. When he had done, George Keith would be speaking,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account