Of those early voyages, we need mention only one, which took him to
Rome. Immense the impression the Holy City made on his imagination!
He saw not the Rome of the Cæsars, nor the Rome of the Popes,--the
city whose monuments entomb twenty-five centuries of history; but,
he says, “the Rome of the future, that Rome of which I have never
despaired,--shipwrecked, at the point of death, buried in the depth of
American forests; the Rome of the regenerating idea of a great people;
the dominating idea of whatever Past or Present could inspire in me,
as it has been through all my life. Oh, Rome became then dear to me
above all earthly existences. I adored her with all the fervor of my
soul. In short, Rome for me is Italy, and I see no Italy possible
save in the union, compact or federate, of her scattered members. Rome
is the symbol of united Italy, under whatever form you will. And the
most infernal work of the Papacy was that of keeping her morally and
materially divided.”[3]
[3] This was written in 1849.
Thenceforth the young mariner, who rose rapidly to be mate and master,
could not rest for the thought of the Eternal City, and of the country
his patriotism craved. During these years, he learned to take Fortune’s
buffets: he was captured by pirates, he lay ill and penniless for
months at Constantinople,--adventures which in another career would
demand more than passing notice, but which he deemed unimportant in
comparison with a conversation he had with a young Ligurian, who
unfolded to him the dreams of the Mazzinians. “Columbus did not
experience so great a satisfaction at the discovery of America,” says
Garibaldi, “as I experienced at finding one who busied himself with the
redemption of our fatherland.”
Fatherland! the name seemed a mockery to the Italians of that time.
Italy, as Metternich phrased it, was only a geographical expression.
Seven or eight petty princes, including the Pope, ruled the little
patches into which the Peninsula was cut up. All the north, except
Piedmont, was directly subject to a foreign despot, Austria; while,
indirectly, Austria domineered over Tuscany, Rome, and Naples.
Piedmont had a native king, indeed, but Absolutism throve nowhere
more vigorously than there. The Jesuits controlled the worship and
education of the little kingdom; reactionaries filled the ministerial
offices, the army, and the government bureaux; the sovereign himself,
Charles Albert, believed devoutly in the divine right of kings, and
held that it would be criminal in him, by granting his people more
freedom, to lessen the responsibility imposed on him by God. Throughout
the Peninsula, no one might discuss politics, whether in speech or
writing. It was high treason to suggest representative government; the
sovereign’s will was the only constitution. In some parts of the land,
the very word _Italy_ could not be used by actors on the stage; and
everywhere censors kept watch to prevent the idea of a regenerate Italy
from slipping into print.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account