Throttled! The Detection of the German and Anarchist Bomb PlottersTunney, Thomas J. (Thomas Joseph)
History
Throttled! The Detection of the German and Anarchist Bomb Plotters
Tunney, Thomas J. (Thomas Joseph)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Secret service -- Germany
“Seems no action taken yet. If want work, change methods
completely. I insist the man in charge is not only useless but
spoiling the work; important workers wasting time for want of
coöperation and funds while that man is squandering money. Do
not care what you decide, I inform you as it is my duty but you
don’t seem to pay any attention. This is my last warning for
the cause. Again I appeal to you to think more seriously and
not spoil the work by leaving it in the hands of irresponsible
and insane person. I again tell you that no one is willing to
work with him because he does not understand anything, secondly
he spends money in a ridiculous way, thirdly he does not do any
work. Think seriously and reply.”
In order to show why Gupta was upset and also in passing to show how
innocently he had coded his letter, we shall quote it in full, with
those words in italics which had to be decoded months later:
“Dear _Chatto_: Am back from _Japan_. Had lots _trouble_.
_Thakur_, real _name Rash Behari Ghose_, splendid worker in
_India_ still in _Japan_. Sent report twice, besides messages
through _German_ sources. Went to _Japan_ as planned. Am
surprised to hear from _Tarak_ you said I had no _right_ to go
to Japan. See my reports submitted to the committee. Before
leaving _Berlin Shanghai_ authorities also wanted me for
important work. This I was told at _German Embassy_ so cannot
understand why you failed to know anything about me. Have sent
two reports since my return. Hope you got them. _Tarak_ said
you were not satisfied with _my work_ and _Bhupen Dutt_ said
that such incapable men as _I_ should not have been sent to
America. _Bhupen_ before leaving _America_ said to _Chakravarty
‘Gupta_ nothing but _adventurer_; should not have been sent,’
and as usual everybody knew and it naturally prejudiced men
_I_ had to work with. What right had _Bhupen_ to make such
remarks? I don’t claim to be a very capable man. You remember
I did not want to _come here_. But how _Bhupen_ measured my
abilities? If no report was received how could anybody pass an
opinion on unknown things? You may _criticize my_ reticence.
I do not believe there are very many men including _Bhupen_
who can show much better results along the line of _work I_
undertook. Results of such work cannot be shown in _black and
white_ but I challenge anybody who dares ignore the _solid
work_ done through _our agencies_. Time alone can prove it.
You cannot compare the _work_ lately undertaken with the
_program_ we started with. If we _failed to start a revolution
in Bengal_ as asked by you it has been for the best. If we
_failed land arms_ it was due more to _Germans_ than anybody
else. Our _men worked, suffered_. Still _suffering_. The whole
plan under the direct supervision of _Germans_ of more capable
_brains failed_ too.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account