Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875Evans, Arthur, Sir
History
Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875
Evans, Arthur, Sir
Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Description and travel; Bosnia and Herzegovina -- History -- Rebellion of 1875
By a strange irony of fate the blow fell hardest on the cities, where
the Bogomilian faction lay.[115] How terrible was their calamity the
example of Jaycze, the chief city of the realm, and Clissa, the last
refuge of Bosnian royalty, abundantly display. The burghers of Jaycze,
relying on the Sultan’s pledge to respect their municipal freedom, their
ancient privileges and their property, had gone forth to welcome him
within their gates. But no sooner was the city in his possession than the
treacherous Osmanlì, not content with arresting the chief nobility of the
realm and the king’s brother and daughter whom he found within the walls,
seized on the children of the leading citizens for distribution among his
Pashàs and Agas, and enrolment in his new body-guard. The fate of Clissa
(or Kliuć) was still more overwhelming. The Turkish Beglerbeg divided the
townspeople into three parts. One of them he adjudicated to his troops
as booty; another portion, the youths and children, he set apart for
enrolment in the Janissary guard; and the remainder, but not, we may be
assured, either the young or the beautiful, he left to pay tribute for
their desolated homes.
That it was nothing but the sheerest intolerance that drove the Bogomiles
to welcome Turkish rule in Bosnia is conclusively shown by the different
attitude adopted by their co-religionists of Herzegovina. This can be
accounted for by no ties of personal loyalty to the reigning Duke.
Stephen’s whole career might well have inspired the most vehement
repugnance among subjects more tolerant to human weakness than is
the wont of Puritans. Stephen Cosaccia was by all accounts a selfish
voluptuary, careless of religion, described as fickle as the wind, and
reckless as he was ambitious. He had seized his son’s wife, a beautiful
Florentine, and when his son and the outraged Duchess saved themselves
from perpetual insult by taking shelter within the hospitable walls of
Ragusa, had brought disasters on the land by his insolent pretensions.
The Ragusans, indignant at his demand for the extradition of the
fugitives, his claims on part of their territory, his raising the
salt-tax, did not content themselves with impeaching their rebellious
senator of high treason, but invaded Herzegovina, took his treasure
castle of Blagai and ducal city of Mostar, and hardly needed the double
intervention of Pope and Sultan to reduce him to an humiliating peace
and the payment of a war indemnity. Stephen Cosaccia changed his creed
with as much facility as he changed his consort. In the beginning of his
reign, when Bosnian kings leaned to Bogomilism, it had suited his policy
to bid for Papal favour and raise his County into a Duchy by playing the
part of a faithful son of the Church. But when the King of Bosnia had
made his peace with Rome, when all hopes that he may have cherished of
placing the Bosnian crown upon his own head were finally dashed, when
further a Papal legate had presided at that diet of Coinica by which
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account